Avaliações do Autodesk Construction Cloud

Avaliação Autodesk Construction Cloud

Comentários: É um ambiente seguro onde podemos estar gerenciando os documentos na nuvem, além de ser muito prático a sua utilização!

Vantagens:

Esta sendo muito prático, para nossa criação de fluxos de trabalho, auxiliando no gerenciamento de informações entre colaboradores de forma segura.

Desvantagens:

Os recursos são muito bom e de fácil uso, eu recomendo muito a utilização dessa ferramenta.

Software de excelência

Comentários: Esse era o último processo que estava pendente para ser migrado para as nuvens. Estavamos receosos mas ficamos surpreendidos com a qualidade.

Vantagens:

Gostei porque é uma ferramente certeira, nao tem aquela interface poluida que geralmente os outros tem e a facilidade de acesso.

Desvantagens:

Talvez algumas cores dos botões ou nas linhas.

Ótima ferramenta

Vantagens:

Eu adoro o Autodesk Construction pois ele é programa incrível para construção civil. A facilidade de gravar tudo na nuvem é super prático.

Desvantagens:

Acredito que interface poderia ser mais limpa e organizada, as vezes o servidor fica lento para entrar, seria interessante ser mais rápido o processo de login.

App para gerenciamento e organização

Comentários: Utilizamos diariamente no escritório. Trabalhamos toda a rotina, revisão de projetos, indicações de tarefas e as demais atividades do escritório alinhadas e organizadas.

Vantagens:

Um app muito útil para que trabalha no meio de projetos e construção. Poder ter um overview de todas as etapas, todos os responsáveis e todos os projetos gera um ganho muito grande para o escritório.As funções de cada responsável, cada etapa e cada projeto ficam mais definidas e organizadas. O fato de estar numa nuvem ajuda a manter as versões e revisões sempre atualizadas e de fácil acesso sempre.

Desvantagens:

Creio que o ponto negativo seja o valor, ainda é muito alto.

Software antigo, fácil de usar, mas já deixa a desejar

Vantagens:

Tem todas as ferramentas na palma da mão, facilitando a organização, vendas e estoque.

Desvantagens:

Muita lentidão, principalmente para criar novas telas, além de não ser tão simples de aprender a usar, isto é, não é tão intuitívo.

Ótimo para execução de obras.

Comentários: Muito bom. Mas se aumentar o espaço da memória para celulares, com certeza sai na frente de muitos outros apps.

Vantagens:

Ajuda muito na organização de projetos, orçamentos.

Desvantagens:

Ainda um pouco limitado para versão celular.

muito bom

Comentários: foi muito boa

Vantagens:

facilidade em utilizar o software e praticidade

Desvantagens:

os valores não são tão atrativos , baixa muito coisa no computador

Autodesk Construction Cloud

Vantagens:

como ferramenta de Conexão de fluxos de trabalho é excelente

Desvantagens:

poderia ter mais ferramentas de qualidade para interagir e controlar os fluxos de trabalho

arkon-Autodesk Construction Cloud

Comentários: Agilidade na compatibilização de projeto, tras beneficil para toda equipe.

Vantagens:

O recurso de modificação em tempo real e compatibilização de projetos são muito bons, facil ultilização interface intuitiva, tive um pouco de dificuldade na instalação.

Desvantagens:

Dificuldade na instalação do software, poderia melhor a velocidade de download da nuvem.

Trabalho onde quero

Vantagens:

Tenho acesso ao trabalho onde quero com a maior segurança.

Desvantagens:

Gostaria de aceder aos desenhos, só para visualização, de uma maneira muito fácil, sem o software "mãe" instalado num PC.

Avaliação Software

Comentários: A minha experiencia é bastante boa e positiva Recomendo

Vantagens:

Gosto bastante do software devido á facilidade de trabalhar com o mesmo.

Desvantagens:

Não uso todas as possibilidades que o software oferece

importante para negocios

Comentários: muito boa em geral como eu disse me ajuda organizar as tarefas e também me da ideia como elaborar tal coisa.

Vantagens:

ele me ajuda na pesquisa de meus produtos.

Desvantagens:

um suporte maior acho deveria ser melhor nessa ARÉA.

Plangrid

Comentários: Great. The app is extremely intuative so the learning curve is reduced and simple. Just looks more complicated then it really is.

Vantagens:

Document viewing the Field is a necessity. Linking RFI's and submittals to the drawings makes things clear and reduces misses during construction.

Desvantagens:

Sometimes sync issue while uploading photos and documents while changing from WIFI to LTE. Sometimes the sync needs to be cleared and redone.

ACC is the way to go for collaborative work

Vantagens:

EASE OF ACCESS, TEAMWORK, COLLABORATIVE WORK

Desvantagens:

Problems related to local cache files, problems with Desktop Connector

Don't waste your time

Vantagens:

cheap to get into need to fill the space for minimum number of characters

Desvantagens:

lack of functionality OCR is not upto par can't search text within reports

All hands on deck

Vantagens:

I absolutely love the Compare tool. new to a project and having the ability to see what has happened, changed and catch up is an amazing perk. this all depends on the effort put into keeping things up to date. Best case scenario, its hands down the best tool to have that I have not seen in other software.

Desvantagens:

limited access to or no access to Bim model or clash. it should be available overall because some clashes may be overlooked as it would not pertain directly to the coordinator. I personally think it should be included with no ability to edit but to help communicate overlooked clashes in the model

Another Great Autodesk Feature

Comentários: very positive as with many of the autodesk products, they only improve the longer they are available.

Vantagens:

being able to work on projects from different locations and have the project updating as you continue work is great.

Desvantagens:

rarely there will be loading errors and some info could be lost.

Happy with Autodesk CC

Comentários: Overall our users are happy with Construction Cloud. We used to host our files internally but since moving to CC it has made a big difference as far as ease of accessing and maintaining files

Vantagens:

Safe and secure place to keep working files. It is great for onsite/offsite collabs. Easy learning curve for users

Desvantagens:

It is pricey per seat. As with any cloud product, internet and product uptime dependency is always a risk

review of autodesk construction cloud

Comentários: good to use with the user friendly interfaces.

Vantagens:

data management systems, mobile accessible, visuals and interfaces

Desvantagens:

cost or price is too high than other software.

Useful Program

Comentários: Overall i think its a great program but I've had a few projects where we cant use the construction cloud to its fullest due to knowing/navigating the program.

Vantagens:

Better form of coordination, clash detection between all trades

Desvantagens:

Everyone in the project must know how to use Autodesk CC in order for smooth sailing

Great for BIM managers

Vantagens:

I like the ability to collaborate with consultants.

Desvantagens:

I wish it was more intuitive for general users.

Autodesk construction cloud review

Comentários: It offers collaboration, data management but if requires training and bit expensive.

Vantagens:

I like seemless collaboration capabilities

Desvantagens:

It is bit expensive, i would love it if the cost is little less.

Plan Grid Review

Comentários: Plan grid has been useful for our team to be one step ahead of the game in document control. I am currently working on a larger project with multiple files, especially ASIs. As a result, the overlay capabilities makes it easier to keep up with drawings that have been superseded and have the most current jobs in the field. I like the ability to tag drawings by discipline and in my case phases. The ability to hyperlink drawings to compile an as-built set or update current drawings with referenced RFIs, ASIs or SK drawings is extremely useful. I wish that plan grid would allow users that admins share files (i.e. subcontractors) have the ability not to pay. I think the GC should be responsible for payment , management, and distribution of files. Plan grid should sell perhaps licenses to the GC company and not charge individual subs a monthly fee just to review drawings. As a result, after the trial period ended none of the subs for my job signed up to use Plan Grid. Consequently, I've been using Bluebeam Revu Studio which has similar capabilities and users download a free software through Bluebeam that allows access to all the project folder and files. What Plan Grid has over Bluebeam currently is the OCR to recognize sheet names through the plan index and this is a standard feature; however, in order for Bluebeam to mimic Plan Grids basic principle, it seems like an added cost. Overall I like the software for in-house management but as far as the sharing it with the subs and getting them to use it for a project entirety it has been a struggle. Therefore I think they should either consider lowering the rates for additional users.

Vantagens:

Intuitive and ergonomic functionality. It keeps files up to date and automatically supersedes old files.

Desvantagens:

The cost to share with other team members. If I have a project that has multiple subs that have a Project Manager, Asst Project Manager, Field Superintendent and Foreman who need to have the most updated drawings and each has to pay the fee then it gets pricey on their end. So I think Plan Grid should sell package/licenses s to subcontractor teams so they can distribute to their team in-house which you screen through their email address.

I like the general structure of BIM 360 Field, but I have problems with specific functions.

Comentários: It is great to track your punchlist and rolling completion issues. We did not use it for commissioning, but I would have liked to try it so we could link it to our 360 Glue Revit models. This looks like a very helpful option.

Vantagens:

1). In the field, the iPad app is very easy to use, with the exceptions of a few small things. 2). It is especially easy for contractors to walk their Issues, take pictures, make comments, etc. 3). The print reports and schedule reports module is really helpful. There are many different report types and layout options, which is repeatedly useful. 4). It is easy to see any pertinent info in Issue list view, and print quickly from that page. 5). Customizing the different types of drop down Issue Filters for different users is very handy, and necessary. And it is very easy to sort and search for Issues using the filter module in Issue List view. 6). After I figured out how to contact tech support, it was certain that I would get a diligent response. I would say response time was always within 24 hours, unless I said it was urgent, and very through.

Desvantagens:

Here are common Problems our large team and I run into often: 1). The website commonly has a huge latency when loading new pages. And I mean typically 3-10 seconds, and occasionally 10-20 seconds to load a page. 2). More often than I would like, the Issue List column sorting feature at the top of each column on the website version just will not work. 3). Pinning an issue from the website version is not very intuitive, and takes you a completely different pathway to find the maps. This should be something that is easy to get to from the window of an open issue, just like the iPad app version. 4). Sometimes the syncing function has an error and you need to re-sync. 5). Not frequently, but few times more than I would have liked, the site would just not let people do things like change statuses, or on a couple of occasions even just open the site. 6). After walking in the field adding issues for a while, the iPad app will stop letting you load photos. You have to close and restart the app and you're good to go again.

BIM 360: A good idea, but misses the mark as a whole.

Comentários: I've used BIM-360 as part of the BIM coordination process on 2 separate projects. The idea is that you store your CAD files in the cloud, and the BIM administrator for the project creates composite ("merged") models, combining all of the trade models. These merged models are stored in the cloud and are accessible from computers and ipads. The ability to view current and updated models on an ipad in the field is really the main benefit to using BIM 360, in my opinion.
Having said that, the only way that particular feature (and all of the others, for that matter) works properly, is if the project BIM manager does all of the necessary "housekeeping" so that you have good model hygiene - like using proper model origin and orientations, eliminating "space junk" from the model files. If you have any of those things, the default model view is zoomed way out, and makes it almost impossible to zoom into the model. Every time you hit the "top view" or "home view" buttons, it resets back to being zoomed way out. The BIM 360 model viewer actually works better on the ipad that it's PC application.
Other features that leave a bit to be desired are:

*Navigating the model (PC app). Saving and recalling viewpoints, and running clash detection. Navisworks Manage is far superior in all of those areas.

*If you use BIM 360 to view your model, as opposed to using Navisworks or Revit, you have to upload your CAD file every time you want to see a model update. The upload takes some time and becomes somewhat tedious. There is BIM 360 plugin for Navis Manage that allows you to log into the BIM 360 server through Navis, and view any of the merged models that have been created. So you're essentially using Navis to navigate, take viewpoints, make annotations, run clashes. But you still have to upload your own CAD file to the cloud if you want to see the changes take place in current Navis session. You can save a local copy of the model as an NWD file.
*Navigating the file/folder structure is tedious. When you download a file (another trade's CAD, for example) from Bim 360, it NEVER remembers the previous save location. Very annoying. FINAL THOUGHTS: We scrapped BIM 360 and use only Navis and Dropbox for coordination currently. If our foremen could view an accurate and current model on an ipad in the field the product would be worth consideration. Proper BIM management makes all the difference. There are glitches, and a learning curve.

Vantagens:

The ability for the field to call up the model on an ipad.

Desvantagens:

Everything else is inferior to currently existing market products.