15 anos ajudando empresas brasileiras
a escolherem o melhor software

Avaliações do Autodesk Construction Cloud

Sobre Autodesk Construction Cloud

O BIM 360 é uma ferramenta perfeita para gerentes de projeto, campo e BIM acelerarem a entrega, economizarem dinheiro e reduzirem riscos.

Saiba mais sobre o Autodesk Construction Cloud

Vantagens:

It is easy to go in and do construction takeoffs when needing dimensions or areas for pricing as we are a GC.

Desvantagens:

The BIM 360 Document Management is very confusing to work in that I avoid it at all costs as much as possible.

Notas do Autodesk Construction Cloud

Pontuação média

Praticidade
4,2
Atendimento ao cliente
4,2
Recursos
4,1
Relação qualidade/preço
4,0

Probabilidade de recomendação

8,4/10

O Autodesk Construction Cloud tem uma classificação geral de 4,3 em 5 estrelas com base em 2.168 avaliações de usuários no Capterra.

Você já usou o Autodesk Construction Cloud antes?

Compartilhe suas experiências com outros compradores de software.

Filtrar avaliações (2.168)

Kanaka Pratheek Rao
Kanaka Pratheek Rao
Construction manager
Usuário do LinkedIn Verificado
Construção, 51–200 funcionários
Usou o software para: 6 a 12 meses
Fonte da avaliação

User friendly

4,0 há 3 anos
Legendas em português disponíveis no player de vídeo
Marcela
Assistente administrativo, Brasil
Serviços de Facilities, 501–1.000 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de dois anos
Fonte da avaliação

Avaliação Autodesk Construction Cloud

5,0 há 11 meses

Comentários: É um ambiente seguro onde podemos estar gerenciando os documentos na nuvem, além de ser muito prático a sua utilização!

Vantagens:

Esta sendo muito prático, para nossa criação de fluxos de trabalho, auxiliando no gerenciamento de informações entre colaboradores de forma segura.

Desvantagens:

Os recursos são muito bom e de fácil uso, eu recomendo muito a utilização dessa ferramenta.

Rogerio
Produtor, Brasil
Automação industrial, 11–50 funcionários
Usou o software para: 6 a 12 meses
Fonte da avaliação

Software de excelência

5,0 ano passado

Comentários: Esse era o último processo que estava pendente para ser migrado para as nuvens. Estavamos receosos mas ficamos surpreendidos com a qualidade.

Vantagens:

Gostei porque é uma ferramente certeira, nao tem aquela interface poluida que geralmente os outros tem e a facilidade de acesso.

Desvantagens:

Talvez algumas cores dos botões ou nas linhas.

Felipe
Felipe
Ceo, Brasil
Usuário do LinkedIn Verificado
Atacadistas, 2–10 funcionários
Usou o software para: 6 a 12 meses
Fonte da avaliação

Ótima ferramenta

5,0 ano passado

Vantagens:

Eu adoro o Autodesk Construction pois ele é programa incrível para construção civil. A facilidade de gravar tudo na nuvem é super prático.

Desvantagens:

Acredito que interface poderia ser mais limpa e organizada, as vezes o servidor fica lento para entrar, seria interessante ser mais rápido o processo de login.

leticia
arquiteta, Brasil
Arquitetura e planejamento, 1.001–5.000 funcionários
Usou o software para: 1 a 5 meses
Fonte da avaliação

App para gerenciamento e organização

5,0 ano passado

Comentários: Utilizamos diariamente no escritório. Trabalhamos toda a rotina, revisão de projetos, indicações de tarefas e as demais atividades do escritório alinhadas e organizadas.

Vantagens:

Um app muito útil para que trabalha no meio de projetos e construção. Poder ter um overview de todas as etapas, todos os responsáveis e todos os projetos gera um ganho muito grande para o escritório.As funções de cada responsável, cada etapa e cada projeto ficam mais definidas e organizadas. O fato de estar numa nuvem ajuda a manter as versões e revisões sempre atualizadas e de fácil acesso sempre.

Desvantagens:

Creio que o ponto negativo seja o valor, ainda é muito alto.

Mariana
Estagiário, Brasil
Agricultura, 51–200 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de um ano
Fonte da avaliação

Software antigo, fácil de usar, mas já deixa a desejar

4,0 ano passado

Vantagens:

Tem todas as ferramentas na palma da mão, facilitando a organização, vendas e estoque.

Desvantagens:

Muita lentidão, principalmente para criar novas telas, além de não ser tão simples de aprender a usar, isto é, não é tão intuitívo.

Lucas
Designer., Brasil
Design, Profissional autônomo
Usou o software para: 1 a 5 meses
Fonte da avaliação

Ótimo para execução de obras.

5,0 há 5 meses

Comentários: Muito bom. Mas se aumentar o espaço da memória para celulares, com certeza sai na frente de muitos outros apps.

Vantagens:

Ajuda muito na organização de projetos, orçamentos.

Desvantagens:

Ainda um pouco limitado para versão celular.

Tiely
tecnico agricola, Brasil
Relações governamentais, 2–10 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de dois anos
Fonte da avaliação

muito bom

4,0 ano passado

Comentários: foi muito boa

Vantagens:

facilidade em utilizar o software e praticidade

Desvantagens:

os valores não são tão atrativos , baixa muito coisa no computador

Marcos
administrador, Brasil
Engenharia mecânica ou industrial, 2–10 funcionários
Usou o software para: 1 a 5 meses
Fonte da avaliação

Autodesk Construction Cloud

3,0 ano passado

Vantagens:

como ferramenta de Conexão de fluxos de trabalho é excelente

Desvantagens:

poderia ter mais ferramentas de qualidade para interagir e controlar os fluxos de trabalho

maykon
diretor, Brasil
Engenharia civil, 2–10 funcionários
Usou o software para: 1 a 5 meses
Fonte da avaliação

arkon-Autodesk Construction Cloud

5,0 ano passado

Comentários: Agilidade na compatibilização de projeto, tras beneficil para toda equipe.

Vantagens:

O recurso de modificação em tempo real e compatibilização de projetos são muito bons, facil ultilização interface intuitiva, tive um pouco de dificuldade na instalação.

Desvantagens:

Dificuldade na instalação do software, poderia melhor a velocidade de download da nuvem.

Henrique
Henrique
Engenheiro, Portugal
Usuário do LinkedIn Verificado
Construção, 11–50 funcionários
Usou o software para: 1 a 5 meses
Fonte da avaliação

Trabalho onde quero

5,0 ano passado

Vantagens:

Tenho acesso ao trabalho onde quero com a maior segurança.

Desvantagens:

Gostaria de aceder aos desenhos, só para visualização, de uma maneira muito fácil, sem o software "mãe" instalado num PC.

Tiago
CEO, Portugal
Construção, 2–10 funcionários
Usou o software para: Avaliação gratuita
Fonte da avaliação

Avaliação Software

5,0 ano passado

Comentários: A minha experiencia é bastante boa e positiva Recomendo

Vantagens:

Gosto bastante do software devido á facilidade de trabalhar com o mesmo.

Desvantagens:

Não uso todas as possibilidades que o software oferece

ricardo
CEO, Brasil
Design gráfico, Profissional autônomo
Usou o software para: 1 a 5 meses
Fonte da avaliação

importante para negocios

4,0 ano passado

Comentários: muito boa em geral como eu disse me ajuda organizar as tarefas e também me da ideia como elaborar tal coisa.

Vantagens:

ele me ajuda na pesquisa de meus produtos.

Desvantagens:

um suporte maior acho deveria ser melhor nessa ARÉA.

Mathew
Mathew
Superintendent, Canadá
Usuário do LinkedIn Verificado
Construção, 11–50 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de um ano
Fonte da avaliação

Plangrid

5,0 há 6 meses

Comentários: Great. The app is extremely intuative so the learning curve is reduced and simple. Just looks more complicated then it really is.

Vantagens:

Document viewing the Field is a necessity. Linking RFI's and submittals to the drawings makes things clear and reduces misses during construction.

Desvantagens:

Sometimes sync issue while uploading photos and documents while changing from WIFI to LTE. Sometimes the sync needs to be cleared and redone.

David
Corporate Development Manager, EUA
Construção, 51–200 funcionários
Usou o software para: 6 a 12 meses
Fonte da avaliação

Alternativas consideradas anteriormente:

Autodesk Construction Cloud

4,0 há 9 meses

Comentários: Overall it was okay. The implementation team (3rd party vendor who sold the bundle to us) could have been better, but the product itself was overall good.

Vantagens:

The fact that all of the modules within Build, Cost Management, and Insight tie into each other makes it very easy to create Issues connected to RFIs to Plans, etc.

Desvantagens:

Sometimes it can be a little clunky with how some items work on a desktop version, but not on a mobile version. In Meetings, for example, one can assign due dates and people to complete the action items on the desktop version, but you cannot assign people in the mobile version.

Alessandro
Systems Developer, EUA
Arquitetura e planejamento, 2–10 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de um ano
Fonte da avaliação

The Determined Program for Construction Management

5,0 há 2 meses

Comentários: Autodesk Construction is a determined approach that makes every construction option sustainable.

Vantagens:

The cloud presence from the platform gives it an easy access, and the automation is also well enhanced.

Desvantagens:

The development of this software is error free, and services are incredible

Alex
CEO, Canadá
Construção, 11–50 funcionários
Usou o software para: 6 a 12 meses
Fonte da avaliação
Fonte: SoftwareAdvice

Alternativas consideradas anteriormente:

Don't waste your time

2,0 há 5 anos

Vantagens:

cheap to get into need to fill the space for minimum number of characters

Desvantagens:

lack of functionality OCR is not upto par can't search text within reports

Adam
Project Captain, EUA
Design, 51–200 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de dois anos
Fonte da avaliação

ACC For Coordination

4,0 há 4 meses

Comentários: I am glad that we have this program, I like sharing live models and coordination.

Vantagens:

It helps create coordinated models with our clients and easy to see updates when they happen.

Desvantagens:

There have been a lot of updates from Autodesk, so sometimes it's relearning where and how features work.

Neil
Landscape Technician, Reino Unido
Arquitetura e planejamento, 11–50 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de um ano
Fonte da avaliação

Autodesk Construction Cloud – Fantastic File Sharing with Great Features

5,0 há 3 semanas Novo

Comentários: A fantastic solution that integrates well with our existing Autodesk products. We produce drawings and data in AutoCAD so it's the logical step to use Autodesk Construction Cloud.

Vantagens:

In our organisation file sharing between members of a project team is critically important, Autodesk Construction Cloud allows us to do this with ease and also allows the control of document revisions in a logical and effortless way.

Desvantagens:

There are many different offerings out there when it comes to cloud based file management and to be honest Autodesk Construction Cloud is one of the best, new features have been added since we started out with it and it continues to get even better, you wont be disappointed. There is obviously a cost that comes with implementing this system but well worth it.

Ricardo
Architect, Alemanha
Arquitetura e planejamento, 11–50 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de um ano
Fonte da avaliação

AutoDesk is an excellent and very complete application

5,0 há 2 meses Novo

Comentários: Overall I am satisfied with my experience using AutoDesk. I recommend this application without a doubt.

Vantagens:

It has a good variety of tools and is easy to use. It is a very complete application.

Desvantagens:

Need to improve the level of customer support.

arkangshu
Owner, Índia
Usuário do LinkedIn Verificado
Serviços financeiros, Profissional autônomo
Usou o software para: 6 a 12 meses
Fonte da avaliação

I recommend everyone to use Autodesk Construction Cloud

5,0 há 2 meses Novo

Vantagens:

The most I like about Autodesk Construction Cloud is its seamless collaboration tools.

Desvantagens:

The least i like about Autodesk Construction Cloud is its limited customization option.

Patrick
Project Coordinator, Canadá
Construção, 11–50 funcionários
Usou o software para: 1 a 5 meses
Fonte da avaliação

Build seems to work good but it lacks some of the ease of use compare to other softwares.

4,0 há 2 meses Novo

Vantagens:

Some functionality features work really well and could help with project management.

Desvantagens:

Some of the website design is not easily comprehensive.

Ehsan
Architectural Technician, Canadá
Arquitetura e planejamento, 51–200 funcionários
Usou o software para: 1 a 5 meses
Fonte da avaliação

My analysis of the software

4,0 há 2 meses Novo

Comentários: It's great and I personally enjoy working with it

Vantagens:

Easy and fast use of this software is very good.

Desvantagens:

Being expensive and at the same time dependent on other software

Robert
Project Engineer, EUA
Construção, 11–50 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de um ano
Fonte da avaliação

Plan Grid Review

4,0 há 7 anos

Comentários: Plan grid has been useful for our team to be one step ahead of the game in document control. I am currently working on a larger project with multiple files, especially ASIs. As a result, the overlay capabilities makes it easier to keep up with drawings that have been superseded and have the most current jobs in the field. I like the ability to tag drawings by discipline and in my case phases. The ability to hyperlink drawings to compile an as-built set or update current drawings with referenced RFIs, ASIs or SK drawings is extremely useful. I wish that plan grid would allow users that admins share files (i.e. subcontractors) have the ability not to pay. I think the GC should be responsible for payment , management, and distribution of files. Plan grid should sell perhaps licenses to the GC company and not charge individual subs a monthly fee just to review drawings. As a result, after the trial period ended none of the subs for my job signed up to use Plan Grid. Consequently, I've been using Bluebeam Revu Studio which has similar capabilities and users download a free software through Bluebeam that allows access to all the project folder and files. What Plan Grid has over Bluebeam currently is the OCR to recognize sheet names through the plan index and this is a standard feature; however, in order for Bluebeam to mimic Plan Grids basic principle, it seems like an added cost. Overall I like the software for in-house management but as far as the sharing it with the subs and getting them to use it for a project entirety it has been a struggle. Therefore I think they should either consider lowering the rates for additional users.

Vantagens:

Intuitive and ergonomic functionality. It keeps files up to date and automatically supersedes old files.

Desvantagens:

The cost to share with other team members. If I have a project that has multiple subs that have a Project Manager, Asst Project Manager, Field Superintendent and Foreman who need to have the most updated drawings and each has to pay the fee then it gets pricey on their end. So I think Plan Grid should sell package/licenses s to subcontractor teams so they can distribute to their team in-house which you screen through their email address.

Lance
Quality Lead, EUA
Construção, 1.001–5.000 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de um ano
Fonte da avaliação

I like the general structure of BIM 360 Field, but I have problems with specific functions.

4,0 há 7 anos

Comentários: It is great to track your punchlist and rolling completion issues. We did not use it for commissioning, but I would have liked to try it so we could link it to our 360 Glue Revit models. This looks like a very helpful option.

Vantagens:

1). In the field, the iPad app is very easy to use, with the exceptions of a few small things. 2). It is especially easy for contractors to walk their Issues, take pictures, make comments, etc. 3). The print reports and schedule reports module is really helpful. There are many different report types and layout options, which is repeatedly useful. 4). It is easy to see any pertinent info in Issue list view, and print quickly from that page. 5). Customizing the different types of drop down Issue Filters for different users is very handy, and necessary. And it is very easy to sort and search for Issues using the filter module in Issue List view. 6). After I figured out how to contact tech support, it was certain that I would get a diligent response. I would say response time was always within 24 hours, unless I said it was urgent, and very through.

Desvantagens:

Here are common Problems our large team and I run into often: 1). The website commonly has a huge latency when loading new pages. And I mean typically 3-10 seconds, and occasionally 10-20 seconds to load a page. 2). More often than I would like, the Issue List column sorting feature at the top of each column on the website version just will not work. 3). Pinning an issue from the website version is not very intuitive, and takes you a completely different pathway to find the maps. This should be something that is easy to get to from the window of an open issue, just like the iPad app version. 4). Sometimes the syncing function has an error and you need to re-sync. 5). Not frequently, but few times more than I would have liked, the site would just not let people do things like change statuses, or on a couple of occasions even just open the site. 6). After walking in the field adding issues for a while, the iPad app will stop letting you load photos. You have to close and restart the app and you're good to go again.

JOHN
Senior VDC Engineer, EUA
Construção, 51–200 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de um ano
Fonte da avaliação

BIM 360: A good idea, but misses the mark as a whole.

3,0 há 7 anos

Comentários: I've used BIM-360 as part of the BIM coordination process on 2 separate projects. The idea is that you store your CAD files in the cloud, and the BIM administrator for the project creates composite ("merged") models, combining all of the trade models. These merged models are stored in the cloud and are accessible from computers and ipads. The ability to view current and updated models on an ipad in the field is really the main benefit to using BIM 360, in my opinion.
Having said that, the only way that particular feature (and all of the others, for that matter) works properly, is if the project BIM manager does all of the necessary "housekeeping" so that you have good model hygiene - like using proper model origin and orientations, eliminating "space junk" from the model files. If you have any of those things, the default model view is zoomed way out, and makes it almost impossible to zoom into the model. Every time you hit the "top view" or "home view" buttons, it resets back to being zoomed way out. The BIM 360 model viewer actually works better on the ipad that it's PC application.
Other features that leave a bit to be desired are:

*Navigating the model (PC app). Saving and recalling viewpoints, and running clash detection. Navisworks Manage is far superior in all of those areas.

*If you use BIM 360 to view your model, as opposed to using Navisworks or Revit, you have to upload your CAD file every time you want to see a model update. The upload takes some time and becomes somewhat tedious. There is BIM 360 plugin for Navis Manage that allows you to log into the BIM 360 server through Navis, and view any of the merged models that have been created. So you're essentially using Navis to navigate, take viewpoints, make annotations, run clashes. But you still have to upload your own CAD file to the cloud if you want to see the changes take place in current Navis session. You can save a local copy of the model as an NWD file.
*Navigating the file/folder structure is tedious. When you download a file (another trade's CAD, for example) from Bim 360, it NEVER remembers the previous save location. Very annoying.
FINAL THOUGHTS: We scrapped BIM 360 and use only Navis and Dropbox for coordination currently. If our foremen could view an accurate and current model on an ipad in the field the product would be worth consideration. Proper BIM management makes all the difference. There are glitches, and a learning curve.

Vantagens:

The ability for the field to call up the model on an ipad.

Desvantagens:

Everything else is inferior to currently existing market products.