--- description: Tudo sobre GitHub: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitHub - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Brasil 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Programas para Desenvolver Aplicativos](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [GitHub](/software/129067/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.br/software/129067/github Página: 1 / 248\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/129067/github?page=2) > O GitHub permite que as equipes de desenvolvimento colaborem, avaliem e gerenciem o código em um pipeline de DevOps e segurança de código integrada. > > Conclusão: 6172 usuários atribuíram a nota **4.8/5**. Melhor classificado para **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa o GitHub? Desenvolvimento de software para pequenas startups e grandes empresas. ## Estatísticas e notas | Métrica | Classificação | Detalhes | | **Geral** | **4.8/5** | 6172 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.4/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.3/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.6/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Recursos | 4.7/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Porcentagem de recomendação | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: Microsoft - **Localização**: Redmond, EUA - **Fundada**: 1975 ## Contexto comercial - **Preço inicial**: US$ 4,00 - **Modelo de preços**: (Versão gratuita disponível) (Teste grátis) - **Público-alvo**: Profissional autônomo, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Implantação e plataformas**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Windows (local), Linux (local), Android (celular), iPhone (celular), iPad (tablet) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Países disponíveis**: Alemanha, Arábia Saudita, Austrália, Bielorrússia, Brasil, Bulgária, Bélgica, Canadá, China, Coreia do Sul, Croácia, Dinamarca, Egito, Espanha, Estados Unidos, Estônia, Finlândia, França, Hungria, Indonésia e mais 27 ## Recursos - Ambiente de desenvolvimento integrado - Automated Testing - Compartilhamento de arquivos - Controle de marcos - Controle de qualidade - Controle de versões - Controle do progresso de tarefas - Depuração - Desenvolvimento colaborativo - Detecção de bugs/erros - Entrega contínua - Ferramentas de colaboração - Gerenciamento de configuração - Gerenciamento de repositórios - Gestão de edição - Gestão de lançamento - Gestão de pendências - Gestão de projetos - Gestão de tarefas - Gestão de tíquetes - Implantação contínua - Integração contínua - Interface gráfica do usuário - Monitoramento - Painel - Rastreamento de edição - Rastreamento de erros - Real-Time Analytics - Revisão de código - Scanner de vulnerabilidades - Seguimento de relatórios/projetos - Segurança de aplicativos ## Integrações (14 no total) - CircleCI - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Vercel - Visual Studio Code ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento ## Category - [Programas para Desenvolver Aplicativos](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Programas para Desenvolver Aplicativos](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [Software de Gestão de Código-Fonte](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) - [Software de Gestão de Projetos sem Fins Lucrativos](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) - [Ferramentas de Gestão de Projetos](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Software de Integração Contínua](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15371 reviews) 2. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/101288/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3006 reviews) 3. [GitLab](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/159806/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1220 reviews) 4. [Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/157785/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1345 reviews) 5. [Airtable](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/146652/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2229 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "My take on Github" — 5.0/5 > **Avaliador Verificado** | *26 de outubro de 2019* | Software | Taxa de recomendação: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Friendly interface, helpful guides and a vibrant OpenSource community set up around this particular Git remote host. Github has features that other Git remotes lack such as following the feed of other devs. > > **Desvantagens**: New features such as Github actions are still buggy, messy and lacking. The new issue template system seems hacky with the idea of Github configurations, I would feel more comfortable as a dev if switching to another Git remote did not bring along the prospect of breaking the workflow of my project. > > Github has been my top choice in terms of Git hosting, pretty, friendly and with a marvelous community around it. There have been some misses in my opinion, such as Github related apps for Windows or Github Actions, but despite these Github is by far the best option as of now. ----- ### "The undisputed standard for code collaboration and open source" — 4.0/5 > **Davide** | *17 de abril de 2026* | Segurança e investigações | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: GitHub Actions is the CI/CD tool I prefer over any other. It is immediate, works extremely well, supports multiple operating systems, and even allows you to run self-hosted runners on-premises with minimal setup. What makes it truly powerful is the ecosystem: thousands of community-built, reusable actions exist for almost every use case, so you rarely have to reinvent the wheel. This saves an enormous amount of time day to day. Beyond Actions, the pull request workflow is excellent and the collaboration features — Issues and Discussions in particular — are extremely convenient and well-designed. GitHub is also the de facto standard for open source: almost every meaningful open source project lives here, and the fact that public repositories are free makes it the natural home for community-driven software. I use it both for my personal open source projects and at an enterprise level, and it handles both scenarios very well. The ability to host public and private repositories on the same platform without needing separate tools is a significant advantage. > > **Desvantagens**: The project management section (GitHub Projects) still feels rough compared to dedicated tools like Linear. It works, but the UX is unintuitive and I usually reach for other tools when I need real project tracking. Issues and Discussions are great; Projects needs more work. Stability has also become a concern. GitHub has been experiencing more frequent outages lately. They are usually short, but they are disruptive — when your entire workflow depends on GitHub (pushing code, running pipelines, reviewing PRs), even brief downtime brings everything to a halt. Finally, the notification system is genuinely broken for my use case. The sheer volume of notifications makes it nearly impossible to find the ones that actually matter — a comment on your own issue, a review request, a mention. I often miss important updates unless someone tells me directly or I stumble across them manually. > > GitHub is a tool I would recommend to any team, regardless of size or industry. Small teams can get started for free; larger organizations can scale up to GitHub Enterprise. The platform works equally well for closed-source commercial projects and public open source repositories, and you never need to split your work across multiple tools. I would especially recommend it to anyone building or contributing to open source software — GitHub is the central hub where projects are born, grow, and gain traction. There is simply no better place to build in public. It is also worth noting that GitHub is not limited to software developers. Writers, researchers, and academics can benefit from version-controlled plain-text workflows (Markdown, LaTeX) managed through branches and releases — and modern AI tooling makes the learning curve much more approachable than it used to be. In short: I could not work without GitHub. Despite its rough edges, it remains the most complete and widely adopted platform for code collaboration and version control available today. ----- ### "Reliable but stingy github actions capacity" — 5.0/5 > **Avaliador Verificado** | *26 de março de 2026* | Consultório médico | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: I appreciate the github actions, which allows me to run automated testing for each one of my pull requests. > > **Desvantagens**: It's annoying that I am not able to have unlimited github actions for private repos that I pay for. It's limited to a cap, which I think is a little stingy considering that I am a paying customer. I would have expected the same caps as public github repos. > > Overall, the experience is great. It's a very convenience way to store my git repos online, and I can trust that the data will be there to stay since it is owned by Microsoft. I've have my github for almost 10 years. Some years I am more active than others, but I can always count on the experience being consistent and reliable. ----- ### "Good tool for code management but lacks some features when integrating with Confluence/Jira" — 3.0/5 > **Mark** | *3 de junho de 2025* | Serviços e tecnologia da informação | Taxa de recomendação: 6.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: GitHub is a great tool to manage pull requests and being able to add labels in our teams helps to differentiate between urgent items which need reviews and are vital for the next release. > > **Desvantagens**: One of the drawbacks with GitHub is integrating non development team members into a workflow process. Even though it is possible to setup a workflow too add approvers the terminology and UI is very developer based so can be a bit confusing to non development colleagues. > > Overall GItHub is a good tool for managing code, getting reviews and merging into the relevant branch ahead of deployment. There are some good integrations but it would be great if it could work more seamlessly with Confluence and Jira, and provide additional features to help automatically manage the correct states of the linked jira. ----- ### "Perfect for all sizes of projects" — 5.0/5 > **🧑‍💻 Owain** | *6 de abril de 2026* | Internet | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: I enjoy working with GitHub due to its ease of use and that so many people use it so there are tons of online resources available if you get stuck trying to set something up > > **Desvantagens**: Sometimes swapping between repos can be cumbersome. If you have multiple organisations it's not always a smooth transition between repos > > I enjoy working with GitHub so much that we've recently migrated all our bitbucket repos to GitHub. It's great that we can keep client repos private but still show our activity on our own personal accounts ----- Página: 1 / 248\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/129067/github?page=2) ## Links - [Ver em Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/129067/github) ## Esta página está disponível nos seguintes idiomas | Localidade | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## Dados estruturados