--- description: Tudo sobre HackerRank: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: HackerRank - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Brasil 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software de Provas de Seleção](/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) > [HackerRank](/software/143549/hackerrank) # HackerRank Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.br/software/143549/hackerrank Página: 1 / 5\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) > Ele capacita os recrutadores de tecnologia a selecionar, entrevistar e contratar os melhores talentos técnicos. > > Conclusão: 93 usuários atribuíram a nota **4.5/5**. Melhor classificado para **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa o HackerRank? Qualquer empresa que precise contratar talentos técnicos, como engenheiros, programadores, administradores de Linux, analistas de banco de dados, desenvolvedores de dispositivos móveis e muito mais. ## Estatísticas e notas | Métrica | Classificação | Detalhes | | **Geral** | **4.5/5** | 93 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.6/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.4/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.3/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Recursos | 4.5/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Porcentagem de recomendação | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: HackerRank - **Fundada**: 2012 ## Contexto comercial - **Preço inicial**: US$ 199,00 - **Modelo de preços**: (Teste grátis) - **Público-alvo**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Implantação e plataformas**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Países disponíveis**: Afeganistão, Albânia, Alemanha, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antígua e Barbuda, Argentina, Argélia, Armênia, Aruba, Arábia Saudita, Austrália, Azerbaijão, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Barein, Belize, Benin e mais 208 ## Recursos - Agendamento de entrevistas - Avaliação de habilidades - Biblioteca de perguntas - Biblioteca de testes predefinidos - Classificação automática - Comparação de candidatos - Criação de testes e questionários - Ferramentas de colaboração - Gestão de avaliações - Gestão de candidatos - Gestão de entrevistas - Gestão de modelos - Importação/exportação de dados - Indicadores de desempenho - Modelos - Perguntas personalizáveis - Pontuação - Relatórios e análise de dados - Seguimento dos candidatos - Testes e avaliações - Testes online - Testes para candidatos - Testes personalizáveis ## Integrações (6 no total) - Avature - Greenhouse - JazzHR - Jobvite - Lever - Workable ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Suporte por telefone - Assistência 24/7 - Bate-papo ## Category - [Software de Provas de Seleção](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Software de Provas de Seleção](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) - [Software de Avaliação](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/31117/assessment/software) - [Software de Recrutamento e Seleção](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30060/applicant-tracking/software) - [Software de Recrutamento](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30602/recruiting/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Zoho Recruit](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/125768/zoho-recruit) — 4.5/5 (1268 reviews) 2. [ZipRecruiter](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/130706/ziprecruiter) — 4.2/5 (10949 reviews) 3. [NEOGOV](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/75288/neogov) — 4.5/5 (850 reviews) 4. [Indeed for Employers](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/161381/indeed) — 4.5/5 (7610 reviews) 5. [Paylocity](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/86714/webpay) — 4.3/5 (1927 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Uma plataforma de testes muito útil e acessível." — 4.0/5 > **Rayan** | *19 de janeiro de 2026* | Software | Taxa de recomendação: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: O produto possui uma excelente relação custo-benefício. Possui uma biblioteca ampla ta testes e uma interface muito intuitiva. > > **Desvantagens**: O suporte ainda precisa melhorar, em muitos momentos os retornos demoram muito pra acontecer e as conversas em emails ficam confusas. Claro que isso pode ter vindo da nossa CS e não necessariamente da plataforma em si. > > Em geral eu gosto muito, é altamentamente funcional e também é uma plataforma que muitos candidatos já conhecem, o que facilita bastante. ----- ### "A Reliable Hiring Tool with Room to Grow Beyond Coding" — 4.0/5 > **Prishi** | *14 de julho de 2026* | Software | Taxa de recomendação: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Key highlights include: Candidate activity monitoring – The platform tracks time-on-screen and captures screen size metadata, which helps reviewers assess candidate behavior and flag potential anomalies during assessments. Question library \& defaults – Adding default/pre-built questions is straightforward, making it easy to standardize assessments across roles without starting from scratch each time. Ease of setup – The overall configuration experience is intuitive, reducing the administrative overhead for hiring teams. These features collectively make HackerRank a strong choice for teams looking to run structured, auditable technical interviews at scale. > > **Desvantagens**: While HackerRank excels in many areas, there are a few friction points worth noting: Custom question creation is cumbersome – Adding custom questions is not straightforward and can be time-consuming, especially for teams that need to tailor assessments beyond the default library. The process lacks the simplicity you'd expect given how polished the rest of the platform is. Diagram-based questions are challenging for candidates – When assessments include custom diagrams or drawing-type questions, candidates often struggle with the interface. The drawing tools are not intuitive, which can introduce unnecessary friction during the test and may affect performance for reasons unrelated to the candidate's actual skill. These limitations are worth considering if your hiring process relies heavily on custom or visual problem formats — in such cases, supplementing HackerRank with a dedicated diagramming or whiteboarding tool may be necessary. > > HackerRank is a solid platform for conducting technical assessments, particularly for programming and coding-focused evaluations. The built-in question library, candidate monitoring features, and ease of standardizing assessments make it a reliable choice for most engineering hiring workflows. That said, the platform has room to grow in certain areas: Architectural \& system design questions – HackerRank is not yet optimized for architecture-style assessments. The tooling for whiteboarding, diagramming, and evaluating system design thinking feels underdeveloped compared to its strong coding evaluation capabilities. ----- ### "Outstanding Partnership and Value" — 5.0/5 > **Georgia** | *27 de fevereiro de 2026* | Software | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: How it enabled us to scale and to improve our processes. The platform is incredibly easy to navigate and use. It gives us a great window into how someone will perform in their interviews and shifting to live coding interviews has been game changing. > > **Desvantagens**: In the interviews the video aspect isn't great and could potentially be smoother if it ran through Google Meet instead. > > Hugely positive. The team are great and very responsive, they are as invested as we are to innovate and overcome challenges and this makes for a fantastic partnership. Working with them has allowed us to run new processes, have reliable data to back up changes and trust in what we are trying to build - together. Excellent value for money, helping us to save vast amounts whilst not faltering on quality. ----- ### "Hackerrank review" — 5.0/5 > **Rajul** | *18 de junho de 2026* | Rede de computadores | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: \* Scalable technical assessments that allow evaluation of large candidate pools efficiently. \* Objective and standardized evaluation, helping reduce bias in the screening process. \* Wide library of role-based questions across coding, SQL, AI/ML, security, and other technical domain > > **Desvantagens**: Extremely hard DSA \* Competitive programming questions \* Questions that feel unrelated to the actual role > > Overall, our experience with HackerRank has been positive. The platform has enabled us to efficiently assess technical talent at scale through standardized and objective evaluations. Its extensive question library, assessment customization options, and integrity features have helped improve the quality of candidate screening while reducing manual effort ----- ### "Easy assessment management, but the candidate experience needs improvement" — 3.0/5 > **Flavia** | *10 de agosto de 2026* | Emprego e contratação | Taxa de recomendação: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: From a recruiter’s perspective, HackerRank makes technical assessments easy to send and monitor. Its integration with Ashby allows me to see when a candidate completes an assessment and whether they passed, without having to request updates from the technical team. This makes standardized technical screening easier to manage at scale. > > **Desvantagens**: Assessment invitations expire too quickly in our current setup, which creates unnecessary follow-up work when candidates cannot complete them in time. The Ashby integration shows whether a candidate passed, but does not provide recruiters with a detailed breakdown of the results. Candidates have also reported technical issues, including assessments becoming stuck. When an assessment contains multiple sections, the total time available is not always clear enough, and some candidates have run out of time before completing the second section. I would also like greater transparency around integrity monitoring. One candidate reported that consulting documentation and switching browser tabs generated a cheating-related concern. Tab activity may be useful as one signal, but it needs sufficient context because checking documentation can be part of a realistic development workflow. > > I use HackerRank from the recruiter side rather than managing or creating the technical assessments. It is convenient for sending tests, monitoring completion, and viewing pass or fail results through Ashby. This reduces manual coordination and makes the technical screening stage easier to track. However, my visibility into the actual results is limited, and recurring candidate complaints about unclear timing, technical issues, and integrity monitoring affect the overall experience. It is a useful screening tool, but assessment configuration and candidate communication need to be handled carefully to avoid losing qualified candidates for reasons unrelated to their technical ability. ----- Página: 1 / 5\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) ## Links - [Ver em Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/143549/hackerrank) ## Esta página está disponível nos seguintes idiomas | Localidade | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Dados estruturados