--- description: Tudo sobre ReqView: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ReqView - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Brasil 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Ferramentas para Levantamento de Requisitos](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [ReqView](/software/145388/reqview) # ReqView Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.br/software/145388/reqview Página: 1 / 3\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/145388/reqview?page=2) > Ferramenta de gestão de requisitos de softwares e sistemas para clientes de setores regulamentados cumprirem os padrões de engenharia de sistemas. > > Conclusão: 49 usuários atribuíram a nota **4.6/5**. Melhor classificado para **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa o ReqView? Gestão de requisitos de softwares e sistemas para os quais os requisitos são importantes. Clientes de setores regulamentados confiam no ReqView para manter a conformidade com os padrões críticos de segurança. ## Estatísticas e notas | Métrica | Classificação | Detalhes | | **Geral** | **4.6/5** | 49 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.4/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.9/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.8/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Recursos | 4.1/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Porcentagem de recomendação | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: Eccam - **Fundada**: 2004 ## Contexto comercial - **Preço inicial**: € 430,00 - **Modelo de preços**: (Versão gratuita disponível) (Teste grátis) - **Público-alvo**: Profissional autônomo, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Implantação e plataformas**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Windows (local), Linux (local) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Países disponíveis**: Alemanha, Austrália, Brasil, Canadá, China, Estados Unidos, Japão, México, Reino Unido, Tchéquia, Índia ## Recursos - Gestão de conformidade - Gestão de mudanças - Priorização ## Integrações (11 no total) - Apache Subversion - Bitbucket - Enterprise Architect - GitHub - GitLab - IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS - Jira - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Word - Polarion REQUIREMENTS - Windchill ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Bate-papo ## Category - [Ferramentas para Levantamento de Requisitos](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Ferramentas para Levantamento de Requisitos](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) - [Ferramentas de TI](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/10001/it-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 2. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/162954/reqsuite) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15314 reviews) 4. [TraceCloud](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/135649/tracecloud) — 4.1/5 (67 reviews) 5. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2887 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Try ReqView\!" — 5.0/5 > **Benjamin** | *25 de agosto de 2025* | Design | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Helpful to organize reqs, risks and other stuff. Straightforward setup and customizable. Good options. Great for smaller organizations that can't afford a huge IT overhead and maintenance for more complex products. > > **Desvantagens**: Minimal free access for other users. Main issue is commenting. Need to be able to have a large number of users have access to leave comments. This would be really helpful. Also - simultaneous access for comments (at least leaving their own, not deleting or responding). Other small issues - slow loading and unlocking, could be easier to copy paste cells into other rows/requirements (especially tracing links). > > It has been good. They are responsive to requests, add features we ask for overtime, and it helps us collaborate. It will only get better I think. I would recommend to any small to medium org that needs a simple tracing/req/risk management systems. Massively better than Excel or other handcrafted systems. ----- ### "Lightweight and Capable Requirements Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Tolgahan** | *7 de agosto de 2025* | Aviação e aeroespacial | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: ReqView is very lightweight and fast to use. UI feels modern and fresh and very intuitive. Recently added scaling options make reading on high DPI screens very comfortable. > > **Desvantagens**: No out-of box solution for traceability link coherence/baselining if the linked documents are split into multiple git repositories. > > We are using ReqView as a replacement to Doors Classic. While it is not (yet) a drop in replacement due to some missing functionality, ReqView was flexible enough to let us integrate it into our workflow. Customer support is stellar, they are very responsive, friendly and do their best to find solutions for reported issues. Dev team also seem very capable solving reported issues in a timely manner. ----- ### "Good value for money with great support but still some work to be done on the tool" — 4.0/5 > **Nazar** | *5 de março de 2026* | Companhias aéreas/Aviação | Taxa de recomendação: 7.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Very fast responses from the support team with actual helpful advices. The software is very custom and anyone can tailor it to their needs instead of trying to fit in into the existing framework. Clear roadmap of features to be introduced, the product is constantly improving. It is a good value for money, though. > > **Desvantagens**: There are some features for collaboration that are missing, which prevent us from multiple people using the tool at its maximum capacity ----- ### "Review by Albert" — 3.0/5 > **Albert** | *4 de novembro de 2022* | Fabricação de ferrovias | Taxa de recomendação: 7.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The capability to make traceability between documents and projects in a very efficient way. > > **Desvantagens**: The most critical of the SW to me is the 'CNTRl+Z' command does not exist. ----- ### "Loaded with features for a very reasonable price" — 5.0/5 > **Alexandre** | *12 de dezembro de 2024* | Aviação e aeroespacial | Taxa de recomendação: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The company enhance the product based on user's feedback and needs. The tool is lightweight, no brainer to deploy and maintain. Easy integration with Jira or other tools. The support I received was excellent. Different flexible types of licensing. Affordable. Round trip update from Jira\! Possible to work with distributed teams/tiers (document exchange). > > **Desvantagens**: Indentation when moving requirements across section could be difficult, but with practice it is easier. > > User since 2020 something. Worked in the past with IBM/Jama/R4J (...) and I have to hard time finding out what ReqView is missing compared to those tools, given my experience is mainly in stringent domains (Aero/military). ----- Página: 1 / 3\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/145388/reqview?page=2) ## Links - [Ver em Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/145388/reqview) ## Esta página está disponível nos seguintes idiomas | Localidade | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Dados estruturados