--- description: Tudo sobre Lucidchart: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Lucidchart - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Brasil 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software de Diagramas](/directory/30941/diagram/software) > [Lucidchart](/software/146136/lucidchart) # Lucidchart Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.br/software/146136/lucidchart Página: 1 / 92\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/146136/lucidchart?page=2) > O aplicativo de diagramação online facilita a criação e o compartilhamento de diagramas profissionais. > > Conclusão: 2261 usuários atribuíram a nota **4.5/5**. Melhor classificado para **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa o Lucidchart? O Lucidchart facilita a visualização de uma ideia, processo ou sistema complexo para qualquer pessoa\! ## Estatísticas e notas | Métrica | Classificação | Detalhes | | **Geral** | **4.5/5** | 2261 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.4/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.3/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.4/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Recursos | 4.4/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Porcentagem de recomendação | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: Lucid Software - **Localização**: South Jordan, EUA - **Fundada**: 2010 ## Contexto comercial - **Preço inicial**: US$ 9,00 - **Modelo de preços**: (Versão gratuita disponível) (Teste grátis) - **Público-alvo**: Profissional autônomo, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Implantação e plataformas**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Chromebook (desktop), Android (celular), iPhone (celular), iPad (tablet) - **Idiomas**: alemão, coreano, espanhol, francês, holandês, inglês, italiano, japonês, polonês, português, russo, sueco - **Países disponíveis**: Albânia, Alemanha, Antígua e Barbuda, Argentina, Austrália, Azerbaijão, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belize, Bielorrússia, Bolívia, Brasil, Bulgária, Butão, Bélgica, Bósnia e Herzegovina, Camboja, Canadá, Cazaquistão e mais 78 ## Recursos - Arrastar e soltar - Automação dos processos comerciais - Biblioteca de componentes - Chuva de ideias - Comentários/notas - Conexão de dados - Configuração do fluxo de trabalho - Controle de versões - Controles/permissões de acesso - Criação de diagramas - Criação de fluxogramas - Criação de maquetes - Criação de wireframes - Editor de arrastar e soltar - Editor gráfico de fluxo de trabalho - Ferramentas de colaboração - Fluxograma - Fotos dos funcionários - Gerenciamento de documentos - Gestão do design - Gestão do fluxo de trabalho - Importação/exportação de dados - Interface da área de trabalho - Interface do celular - Mapas mentais - Modelagem de processos & Design - Modelos - Modelos de design - Modelos personalizáveis - Pesquisa e filtro - Protótipos da interface do usuário - Publishing/Sharing - Third-Party Integrations - Visualização de Gantt/linha do tempo ## Integrações (54 no total) - Amazon EC2 - Asana - AuditBoard - BambooHR - Box - Confluence - Craft.io - Dropbox - Dropbox Paper - Figma - GitHub - Gliffy - Google Calendar - Google Classroom - Google Cloud ... e mais 39 integrações ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Suporte por telefone - Bate-papo ## Category - [Software de Diagramas](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30941/diagram/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Software de Diagramas](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30941/diagram/software) - [Software Wireframe](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30850/wireframe/software) - [Programas para Fluxograma](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/31060/flowchart/software) - [Programas para Organograma](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/31397/org-chart/software) - [Software de Gestão de Projetos sem Fins Lucrativos](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Visio](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/201133/visio) — 4.5/5 (3283 reviews) 2. [Miro](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/128955/miro) — 4.7/5 (1699 reviews) 3. [Figma](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/175027/figma) — 4.7/5 (874 reviews) 4. [Aha\!](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/144020/aha) — 4.7/5 (565 reviews) 5. [monday.com AI Work Platform](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6095 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "A Creative and Collaborative Tool for Cross-Team Work" — 5.0/5 > **Aleah** | *8 de julho de 2026* | Serviços ao consumidor | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: What I liked most about Lucidchart is how much creativity it allows while still being practical and easy to use. It gives me the flexibility to build out ideas visually in a way that feels clear and engaging. I also really enjoy the collaborative aspect of the platform, especially when working across multiple teams, because it makes it easy for everyone to contribute and stay aligned. The template library has been a great help with starting a project as well, or at least getting a good idea of how you would want it to flow. > > **Desvantagens**: What I liked least is that some diagrams can become cluttered or harder to manage as projects grow more complex. When a board has a lot of contributors or a large amount of information, it can take extra effort to keep everything organized and easy to follow. Still, that feels more like a challenge that comes with scale than a major issue with the platform itself. > > My overall experience with Lucidchart has been very positive. I’ve enjoyed using it across multiple teams because it supports both creativity and collaboration so well. It has been a helpful tool for brainstorming, mapping out processes, and giving teams a shared visual space to work through ideas together. Overall, it’s been a strong platform that makes teamwork and visual communication much easier. ----- ### "A best in class visual collaboration tool for turning complex projects into clear and actionable plans. Lucid is a premium and innovative frontrunner." — 5.0/5 > **Stephen** | *9 de julho de 2026* | Telecomunicações | Taxa de recomendação: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Lucidchart stands out as a versatile platform for visual project management. Its intuitive drag-and-drop interface make it incredibly easy for everyone on our team to build,edit and refine diagrams without requiring any special skills. The flexibility of being able to access and update our diagrams from any device with an internet connection means we can capture ideas immediately whether we are in the office, at a client site or reviewing infrastructure on the ground. Collaboration is where Lucidchart truly shines. Live cursors, commenting, shared updates and realtime coediting allow our engineering, operations and management teams work on the same diagrams simultaneously, helping us visualize complex network deployments and business workflows faster. We also save save a great deal of time by starting with the extensive template library for network diagrams, process maps, organizational charts and architecture diagrams while the AI assisted diagram generation helps us to quickly transform ideas into clear visual plans. Another feature we rely is the ability to connect diagrams with live Excel and Google sheet data, ensuring our network documentations and project dashboards always reflect the latest information. Lucidchart places a strong emphasis on privacy and security, giving us complete confidence that our sensitive network designs and strategic project information remain protected. > > **Desvantagens**: Lucidchart has worked exceptionally well for us, but we would love to see quicker customer support responses whenever immediate assistance is needed. We would also appreciate a stronger offline functionality that allow us to continue working on diagrams even in areas with unreliable internet connectivity, then sync our work once we're back online > > Deploying Lucid is one of the best investment we have made for the success of our business. As a telecom company, we handle complex network infrastructure projects that involves multiple teams and Lucid has made it easier to visualize network architectures, business processes and project workflows in a way that everyone understands. It has significantly reduced miscommunication across departments, improved collaboration and given us the clarity we need to keep projects moving efficiently from planning to execution. ----- ### "Not worth the costs." — 1.0/5 > **François** | *27 de janeiro de 2026* | Biotecnologia | Taxa de recomendação: 0.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: It was web based and simple to use. That's about it. You can have multiple users access the files from the web. > > **Desvantagens**: The pricing is ridiculous for what amounts to a flow chart software. It can be easily replaced by a variety of FOSS self-hostable software. Something any small business should be able to set up in an afternoon. > > Pretty awful, totally not worth their value proposition. Their customer retention people are aggravating to deal with while trying to close the account and be reimbursed for services not used. ----- ### "Really good web based diagramming tool" — 5.0/5 > **David** | *24 de abril de 2026* | Software | Taxa de recomendação: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Available as a web app that can accessed through any web browser. Really modern UI and includes a huge range of templates (networking diagrams, org charts, etc.) and shapes. Like the ability that it can convert Visio files and PDFs. Live collaborations with other team members within the same file is nice and works as expected. > > **Desvantagens**: There is no desktop application available for either Windows or macOS. The pricing can be a turn off for some people as it is a little on the pricer side when compared to Visio web that is included in most business M365 subscriptions. > > Overall a really good cloud base diagramming and brainstorming application. The UI is modern, clean, and includes a really good catelog of templates. ----- ### "Lucidchart Functionality and Drawbacks Explored Through Real-World Academic Use." — 4.0/5 > **Abdennour** | *7 de abril de 2026* | Educação superior | Taxa de recomendação: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: I- ) What it does well (the good): 1- For standard workflows, Lucidchart nails the fundamentals. the UI is clean ,intuitive and user friendly . The massive pre-built templates is a lifesaver (you dont have to build data pipelines or state machines from absolute scratch . where the platform shines is in it realtime collaboration . working with a group on a shared canvas during project sprints feels completely seamless , it handles multiple cursors , live edits and comment threads ,making it highly reliable daily driver for group work. 2- i love lucid AI ,honestly first time i underestimated its capabilites ,but when i got used to it ,i found it so usefull , especially when it generate diagrames from text , edit those diagrame and tweak them as you prompt ,even explaining what is going on in the diagram and describing it . and one thing took my attention, the feature where you select the objects meant to be affected ,without affecting other objects. (although recording voice sometimes crush,but i trust that it can be corrected easily ) so consider promote lucid ai capabilities and potential a little so that it become known and easy to get familiar with for users. 3- conditional formating with ai : using natural language to say for ex: "highlight all nodes with a latency over 50 ms in red " works efficiently and save you a lot of time by automating dull tasks that takes time especially in huge projects. 4- another caluable capability available, is the ability to import diagram files from other widely used tools , including Visio(.vsdx) and DRaw.io formats for Ex : you can open ,rewiew and make basic edits to diagrams created by other software, this interoperability is helpful in colaborative environement where files may originate from diffrent diagramming platforms. > > **Desvantagens**: II- ) Performance and reliability, and what it doesn't do well (the bad): 1- one of the my "negative" observations in this platform is that it is a bit resource consuming.Sometimes when I work on one small-sized project and check out the task manager ,the browser tab of this lucidchart project is consuming about 1 GB of RAM .i wonder what will happen if the case of a multiple medium-sized projects and big-sized projects with a lucid's realtime communication layer ,i think it will be hard for a normal laptop in this case without stuttering. it is frustrating to have the software become the bottleneck of your thought process ... i know that 16 GB laptops are common amongs CS student and tutors but keep in mind that the user's RAM is used for many other apps and tabs in the browser like a voice chat or video chat meetings and obviously not just the browser , VS code and other programming tools as well... .i wonder how bigger the resource consumption for this chart platform if lucid dev team consider adding additional AI features like FULL diagram generation , or FULL realtime AI collaboration that will have a significant impact on resources, including RAM .so consider optimizing webGL rendering. 2- AI spacial hallucination : when you prompt the ai to generate a complex , multi-layered architecture (like a microservice backend with specific VPC boundaries ...), the ai completely at spacial logic .it will hallucinate parent-child node relationships , put databases outside of security containers , or overlap text boxes. 3- i tried many times to prompt lucid AI to change the layout shapes of all nodes in the diagram , and as always ,the ai reply : " I can't directly swap/replace your existing nodes into diffrent "device" layout shapes with the tools available to me right now .Fastest way to do it manually:" . although , the ai did it before when creating diagrams from scratch , but when trying to update the diagram ,complete Failure , so if i dont use ai for automating simple dull things that takes time , when am i supposed to need it? and it tells me to do it manually... 4- one potential improvement would be the availability of more accessible user support for free-tier users . currently most assistance is provided through documentation and help articles , while more responsive support appears primarly available for paid plans, expanding structured support channels for free users could improve accessibility and user experience , and gives you important feedbacks that might helps you improve the platform ,especially for students , researchers and early adopters exploring the platform. 5- i call it "the spaghetti threshold" : once you hit a certain level of complexity , the "auto-routing" for lines becomes a bottleneck ,if you change your mind about a core component and move it , the software tries to re-route 50 lines at once .if you havent re-planned the layout , you spend more time fixing " line spaghetti" than thinking about the engineering. > > As a final-year computer science engineering student specializing in IoT and AI ,i spend my years in this career mapping out IoT system architecture ,neural networks topologies and complex logic flows before i write a single line of code. so i primarily use Lucidchart to organize research ideas , design systems using diagramming tools, as well as collaborate on academic projects with my professors and my colleagues, making it easier to discuss them. One of the strongest aspects of the platform is real-time collaboration. Working with classmates or discussing ideas with professors on a shared canvas feels smooth and reliable, with live edits and comments that make group work much easier. Features like Lucid AI and conditional formatting can also speed up some tasks, especially when generating diagrams from text or highlighting certain elements automatically. At the same time, the experience is not perfect. The browser version can be resource intensive when projects grow in size, and sometimes the AI struggles with complex architectures or spatial organization in diagrams. Certain repetitive edits still require manual work, which reduces some of the expected automation benefits. Overall, Lucidchart is a solid and professional diagramming platform that works well for organizing technical ideas, documenting systems, and collaborating with others. Despite a few limitations, it remains a practical tool for turning complex concepts into clear visual structures. Comparison between LucidChart and the Alternative diagramming and visual collaboration platforms that i ve tried: 1- Miro is a whiteboard , it has no "logic" .if you want to make a UML diagram in Miro , you have to mannually draw every box and hope they align, it is not for proffessional engineering hands-off because it is too loose. lucidChart has the "industry standard" technical shapes . it has a grid , snapping ,layers.. although to be technically pricise ,lucidchart is better for production in theory , but it can be a failure in practice once the project reaches a certain complexity . The verdict: even with its flaws , lucidchart is still more professional for final document than a whiteboard tool. it is the least bad option for visual documentation. 2- Draw.io is a functional utility , while lucidchart is a premium SaaS Platform , it is for users who need a lightweight ,cost free tool that works offline ,it allows XML manipulation excelent for users who wants to store diagrams in a local directoy. The Trade-off: DRaw.io's UI is significantly more dated, and its real-time collaboration is less seamless than lucidchart's "multiplayer" cursor experience. 3- Eraser.io is built specifically for engineering workflows where lucidchart is more of a generalpurpose collaborative visual Editor. with eraser you can write code to generate diagrams while still having a visual canvas to tweak them .it bridges the gap between manual drawing and automated generation .in the other hand, lucidchart has much broader library of non-technical shapes (like org charts, business processes) that eraser lacks 4- Mermaid.js is a diagram-as-code while lucidchart is a GUI . mermaid is the imdustry standard for documentation that lives inside GitHub repository, because diagrams are writtend in simple markdowm-like text , they can be version-controlled and updated via script. the trade-off: mermaid recuires a learning curve for syntax and offers zero manual "drag and drop" control . that will be a serious inconvenience for a mixed roles Team where only the engineeres can update the charts leading to outdated charts. if the automated layout engine places a node in a confusing spot , you cannot simply click and move it like you do it easily in lucidchart. ----- Página: 1 / 92\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/146136/lucidchart?page=2) ## Links - [Ver em Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/146136/lucidchart) ## Esta página está disponível nos seguintes idiomas | Localidade | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Dados estruturados