17 anos ajudando empresas
a escolher o melhor software

Conheça Fusion Framework System

O Fusion Framework® System alinha seus objetivos estratégicos às principais técnicas de gestão de riscos por meio de ferramentas flexíveis e ágeis. Você define o contexto adequado para analisar, avaliar, supervisionar e responder a riscos e integrar seus dados em toda a empresa para tomar decisões criteriosas. Com o Fusion Framework, você verá maior produtividade e dados de risco mais impactantes ao estabelecer sua base de informações compartilhadas e taxonomia do programa.

Quem usa Fusion Framework System?

Organizações que desejam obter flexibilidade operacional.

Fusion Framework System Software - 1
Fusion Framework System Software - 2
Fusion Framework System Software - 3
Fusion Framework System Software - 4
Fusion Framework System Software - 5

Está em dúvida sobre o Fusion Framework System? Compare com uma alternativa popular

Fusion Framework System

Fusion Framework System

4,4 (48)
Nenhum preço encontrado
Versão gratuita
Versão de teste gratuita
68
6
4,2 (48)
4,1 (48)
4,3 (48)
VS.
Preço inicial
Opções de preços
Recursos
Integrações
Praticidade
Relação qualidade/preço
Atendimento ao cliente
Nenhum preço encontrado
Versão gratuita
Versão de teste gratuita
11
Nenhuma integração encontrada
3,9 (13)
3,9 (13)
3,9 (13)
As barras de classificação verdes mostram o produto vencedor com base na nota média e no número de avaliações.

Outras ótimas alternativas ao Fusion Framework System

RSA Archer Suite
Melhores recursos
Alertas/notificações
Gestão de conformidade
Painel
Shield
Melhores recursos
Nenhum recurso foi avaliado pelos usuários para este produto.
Microsoft Excel
Melhores recursos
Acesso offline
Ferramentas de colaboração
Importação/exportação de dados
Onspring
Melhores recursos
Armazenamento de dados seguros
Avaliação de riscos
Ações corretivas e preventivas (CAPA)
A1 Tracker
Melhores recursos
Gestão de tarefas
Rastreamento de reclamações
Resolução de reclamações
LogicManager
Melhores recursos
Avaliação de riscos
Gerenciamento de documentos
Painel
HSI Donesafe
Melhores recursos
Aprendizado assíncrono
Gestão de cursos
Portal do aluno
Wrike
Melhores recursos
Criação de painel
Cálculo de horas extras
Fluxo de trabalho configurável
Resolver
Melhores recursos
Avaliação de riscos
Geração de relatórios de incidentes
Gestão de conformidade

Avaliações do Fusion Framework System

Pontuação média

Geral
4,4
Praticidade
4,2
Atendimento ao cliente
4,3
Recursos
4,3
Relação qualidade/preço
4,1

Avaliações por tamanho de empresa (funcionários)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Encontre avaliações segundo pontuações

5
54%
4
33%
3
13%
Greg
Greg
Sr. Director, Operational Risk and Strategy, EUA
Usuário do LinkedIn Verificado
Alimentação e bebidas, 10.000+ funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de dois anos
Fonte da avaliação

Strong Business Continuity and Resilience Platform

5,0 há 5 meses

Comentários: We have been partners with Fusion since 2017 and have used the product quite extensively. They are a passionate organization that wants to see their clients be successful and resilient. They have been great to work with.

Vantagens:

The Fusion platform has helped us build our continuity plans, categorize our risks, and incidents across our organization. Fusion is very easy to use, update, and everything connects together easily. The platform is very reliable and stable. In addition, Fusion has been thoughtful with integrations, such as with AlertMedia and Security Scorecard, which allows you to bring in additional data for context and awareness.

Desvantagens:

Because the platform is built on Salesforce, which is pretty easy to use, you're limited to what Salesforce can (or cannot) do - such as enhancements or specific customizations. Also, with Salesforce, additional seat licenses can be expensive.

Resposta do Fusion Risk Management

há 4 meses

Thank you for your review! We are happy to hear that you find the Fusion Framework system easy to use and update. We will be sure to share your positive feedback about the integrations with our team.

Vicky
Risk Management & Business Resilience Director, EUA
Telecomunicações, 201–500 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de dois anos
Fonte da avaliação

Fabulous Fusion Framework

5,0 há 5 anos

Comentários: It took us time to set up and integrate all of our data, but just plan development for all but one of the 40 teams, went from estimated 3-5 days, down to 1 day. That is BIA data collection in the AM and BCP in the PM. We had basic plans with requirements done in 1 day! This saved us 10K hours of team time during the first year. We have been thrilled with the automation both on the planning side and on the Risk Management side.

Vantagens:

That it is so flexible and configurable. We have very specific requirements based on our risk models and this platform allows us to meet every single one.

Desvantagens:

The classic version is dated, but moving to the Lightening is improving our end user experience. It is also somewhat difficult to learn some of the concepts of relational data, how they integrate and are maximized for those who don't have a background in software back ends. Having said that, I'm not a developer and can do most of my own configurations.

David
Owner, EUA
Saúde, bem-estar e condicionamento físico, 11–50 funcionários
Usou o software para: Avaliação gratuita
Fonte da avaliação

Product Review

3,0 há 4 semanas Novo

Comentários: It was an overall a positive experience

Vantagens:

It was a good product that was easy to work with

Desvantagens:

Like most programs, I had hard time customizing it

Ed
Executive Director BCP, EUA
Seguros, 1.001–5.000 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de um ano
Fonte da avaliação

Alternativas consideradas anteriormente:

Fusion Framework System, by Ed Brown

5,0 há 5 anos

Comentários: Improved crisis management and communication during events. We call these response plans which are activated based on the level of the event and are a prelude to a recovery plan activation.

Vantagens:

I love the simplicity as an administrator to make changes, within my knowledge limits and the use of Fuel Hours to supplement my knowledge gaps. There were very view, but some, implementation problems. Fusion listens to their clients and has since improved their implementation process. I presented a complex model to determine the process RTO based 9 impact categories over time. They delivered what I wanted. Of course, I think, everyone client would want this model and it should be a separate object because it did eat up a lot of our available custom fields in the process object. We are working with Fusion to pull that part out and create a new object or leverage a lesser used object. I really like the incident management object.

Desvantagens:

I think there should have been standard dashboarding out of the box. All clients implement a program with a BCP life cycle and dashboard are used to help user and program managers manage compliance to the annual deliverables. Instead these were created with fuel hours. (scale 1-10, 1 being not a big deal to 10 being horrible - this is a 2.) I am also accustom to having a BIA (Process) review with a maintenance control and we used fuel hours to enhance this for a BIA approval section. I think that should be standard. (scale 1-10, 1 being not a big deal to 10 being horrible - this is a 4.) Lastly plan conga generator and its templates are not well designed and we have had several changes requested to make them design the way we want them. Fusion could spend more time on the conga templates clients may like. (scale 1-10, 1 being not a big deal to 10 being horrible - this is a 7.) All these cons are correctable and have been and which is why I added the first PRO above.

Brian
Sr. Disaster Recovery Admin., EUA
Saúde, bem-estar e condicionamento físico, 1.001–5.000 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de dois anos
Fonte da avaliação

Fusion Framework System

5,0 há 5 anos

Comentários: The tool works well for our BC and IT plan management. We have taken the next step to use the tool for our disaster recovery exercise monitoring. We are monitoring our exercises and proof of concepts manually and we will eventually implement the Service now connection that will allow us to track, monitor and delegate tasks once an incident is triggered and the plans are executed. We are looking to use the tool too its full capability.

Vantagens:

Plan configuration and management, Incident management, Processes, Library Procedure Group options, Dashboard for reports, Application and Component records. We were looking to replace our old LDRPS and this was clearly a better tool.

Desvantagens:

The inability to remove/delete user accounts.