--- description: Tudo sobre GitLab: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitLab - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Brasil 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Ferramentas de Gestão de Projetos](/directory/30002/project-management/software) > [GitLab](/software/159806/gitlab) # GitLab Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.br/software/159806/gitlab Página: 1 / 50\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/159806/gitlab?page=2) > Acompanhe o progresso e as atividades de seus projetos. Código, teste e implantação. > > Conclusão: 1224 usuários atribuíram a nota **4.6/5**. Melhor classificado para **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa o GitLab? Plataforma de desenvolvimento e operações baseada na nuvem que ajuda pequenas e grandes empresas a melhorar as operações comerciais usando controle de horas, gestão de incidentes, revisão de código, conformidade regulatória e muito mais. ## Estatísticas e notas | Métrica | Classificação | Detalhes | | **Geral** | **4.6/5** | 1224 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.4/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.2/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.5/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Recursos | 4.6/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Porcentagem de recomendação | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: GitLab - **Fundada**: 2011 ## Contexto comercial - **Preço inicial**: US$ 29,00 - **Modelo de preços**: (Versão gratuita disponível) (Teste grátis) - **Público-alvo**: Profissional autônomo, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Implantação e plataformas**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Windows (local), Linux (local) - **Idiomas**: alemão, chinês, francês, inglês, japonês - **Países disponíveis**: Afeganistão, Albânia, Alemanha, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antígua e Barbuda, Argentina, Argélia, Armênia, Aruba, Arábia Saudita, Austrália, Azerbaijão, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Barein, Belize, Benin e mais 205 ## Recursos - API - Alertas/notificações - Ambiente de desenvolvimento integrado - Arrastar e soltar - Automated Testing - Controle de marcos - Controle de qualidade - Controle de versões - Controle do processo de aprovação - Controles/permissões de acesso - Depuração - Edição de código - Entrega contínua - Ferramentas de colaboração - Fluxo de trabalho de aprovações - Gerenciamento de configuração - Gerenciamento de repositórios - Gestão de carteira - Gestão de conformidade - Gestão de edição - Gestão de lançamento - Gestão de mudanças - Gestão de recursos - Gestão de tarefas - Gestão de testes - Gestão do fluxo de trabalho - Implantação contínua - Integração contínua - Integração do repositório de códigos - Interface gráfica do usuário - Modelos personalizáveis - Monitoramento - Planejamento de projetos - Priorização - Rastreamento de erros - Rastreamento do projeto - Real-Time Analytics - Relatórios de TI - Revisão de código - Scanner de vulnerabilidades - Seguimento de relatórios/projetos - Segurança de aplicativos - Third-Party Integrations ## Integrações (39 no total) - Akismet - Anchore - Asana - Assembla - Bamboo - Beyond Identity - Bitbucket - Bridgecrew - Bugzilla - Buildkite - Campfire Blaze - Checkmarx One - Datadog - Deepfactor - Discord ... e mais 24 integrações ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Assistência 24/7 - Bate-papo ## Category - [Ferramentas de Gestão de Projetos](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30002/project-management/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Programas para Desenvolver Aplicativos](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [Software de Gestão de Projetos sem Fins Lucrativos](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) - [Software de Integração Contínua](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) - [Ferramentas para DevOps](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/31120/devops/software) - [Software Agile](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/31556/agile-project-management-tools/software) ## Alternativas 1. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6198 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15457 reviews) 3. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/101288/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3011 reviews) 4. [Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/157785/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1347 reviews) 5. [Airtable](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/146652/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2242 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "A powerful DevOps powerhouse with a dense but complete interface" — 5.0/5 > **Enguerran** | *18 de maio de 2026* | Artigos esportivos | Taxa de recomendação: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: GitLab has this biggest edge, like it really leans into a full, everything-in-one DevOps platform kind of approach. You get source code management, issue tracking, and CI/CD pipelines that are built in, all tied together inside one single interface, and yeah it feels like a huge productivity push. Setting up pipeline stuff through .gitlab-ci.yml is pretty direct, plus the native Container Registry makes it genuinely easy to roll out Docker images, especially during our day to day development sprints. > > **Desvantagens**: The user interface can feel kind of overwhelming and cluttered, especially when you’re trying to move through those deeply nested settings or while reviewing a complex Merge Request. For non-technical folks, like Product Owners who are tracking issues day to day the initial learning curve is pretty steep. On top of that, the self-hosted instance can get resource-heavy and it tends to need regular maintenance so runner performances stay optimal or at least not degrade to much. > > We use GitLab as our main repository hosting and deployment server, it kinda bridges the gap between engineering and QA workflows. It works well, it links things up without too much friction and honestly it feels solid. Being able to lock down branches, spin up runners to automate code quality checks , and then track deployments automatically, gives us huge security and that calm peace of mind. Overall it is an indispensable, sturdy tool for modern team collaboration and DevOps orchestration, even when things get messy, we still stay on track. ----- ### "Convenient and easy to use" — 5.0/5 > **Song** | *16 de março de 2026* | Armazéns | Taxa de recomendação: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Project management, project builds, and image repositories. These are the tools we use most frequently in our daily development work, and they’re incredibly useful. I also leverage integrations with project management tools to help me complete projects more effectively. > > **Desvantagens**: So far, I haven’t had any complaints. The company uses the official repository, and I use a locally deployed community repository—both work very well.The Enterprise Edition is more expensive. > > GitLab can support our entire development lifecycle, covering the full process from code management to image management. ----- ### "Lets GITtity Up\!" — 4.0/5 > **Drew** | *5 de agosto de 2026* | Bens de consumo | Taxa de recomendação: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Having repository management, task tracking, and CI CD pipelines under one roof is a massive advantage. You do not have to glue together multiple third party tools to get code from a commit into production. Built in runner management, web based code editing, and flexible permission controls make code reviews and project coordination seamless across development teams. > > **Desvantagens**: The user interface can feel cluttered and overwhelming because there are so many features packed into every menu. Performance and page load speeds can occasionally lag on larger repositories or heavy self hosted setups. Navigating through project settings to find specific pipeline or access control options can also take a bit of digging. > > Having used GitLab in previous development environments, it served as a reliable single source of truth for our entire software lifecycle. The value for money is strong considering how many separate services it replaces out of the box. Once your team gets past the initial learning curve, the convenience of managing repositories, issues, and deployments in one platform is hard to beat. ----- ### "User interface is too old" — 3.0/5 > **Ahliman** | *30 de novembro de 2024* | Internet | Taxa de recomendação: 5.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: I started using GitLab because private repositories were free. I've been using it less since private repositories became free on GitHub as well, but it remains a great tool. A large part of its features are sufficient in the free plan. > > **Desvantagens**: I hate GitLab's interface; it's just my personal opinion, but nothing feels intuitive. They use Cloudflare protection everywhere, the colors, etc., make it look like an old-school Microsoft application. Plus, it’s much less popular than GitHub in terms of open-source projects and community activity. > > GitLab doesn’t have much value for my personal use anymore since I’ve migrated all my projects to GitHub. The only advantage GitLab has is the ability to organize projects into categories (which, unfortunately, isn’t possible on GitHub). Many companies still prefer GitLab for historical reasons, but personally, I prefer GitHub. To me, GitLab and Bitbucket are similar products. ----- ### "The Best All-in-One DevOps Platform, Especially for CI/CD" — 5.0/5 > **Avaliador Verificado** | *15 de dezembro de 2025* | Administração pública | Taxa de recomendação: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: I really appreciate GitLab’s single-application approach—it’s become the backbone of our entire DevOps workflow. The built-in CI/CD pipelines are a game-changer; being able to define the entire build, test, and deployment process in a single .gitlab-ci.yml file right in the repository is so much more efficient than juggling separate tools like Jenkins. We rely heavily on merge requests, and the integrated security scanning (SAST/DAST) is a huge plus—it gives developers immediate feedback during the merge process, which helps us catch issues early and maintain quality without slowing down delivery. > > **Desvantagens**: From my experience, GitLab can feel quite resource-intensive, especially when we’re running a self-hosted instance or dealing with pipelines that include complex jobs. I’ve noticed performance slowdowns when navigating large project backlogs or loading detailed merge request diffs, which can be frustrating during critical reviews. While the UI is generally intuitive, the sheer breadth of features—issues, boards, CI/CD, security—can make the initial setup and configuration overwhelming for new team members. It takes some time and guidance before they feel comfortable. > > In my experience, GitLab has truly streamlined our journey from idea to deployment. As a DevOps Engineer, I rely heavily on its seamless integration of source control, issue tracking, and CI/CD automation to keep our delivery pipeline moving at a high velocity. While I’ve noticed a slight learning curve and occasional performance hiccups at scale, the depth of features—especially the native GitOps capabilities—has made it my go-to platform for modern software development and deployment. It’s a solution that genuinely supports the way we work. ----- Página: 1 / 50\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/159806/gitlab?page=2) ## Links - [Ver em Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/159806/gitlab) ## Esta página está disponível nos seguintes idiomas | Localidade | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Dados estruturados