15 anos ajudando empresas brasileiras
a escolherem o melhor software

Conheça Limble CMMS

Uma solução de software de manutenção móvel simples e fácil de usar, que permite gerenciar ativos, PMs, WOs e muito mais.

Quem usa Limble CMMS?

Fabricação, instalações, equipamentos, hotelaria, pequenas empresas, frotas, propriedades, construção, igrejas, ONGs, escolas, academias e muito mais

Limble CMMS Software - 1
Limble CMMS Software - 2
Limble CMMS Software - 3
Limble CMMS Software - 4
Limble CMMS Software - 5

Está em dúvida sobre o Limble CMMS? Compare com uma alternativa popular

Limble CMMS

Limble CMMS

4,8 (468)
Nenhum preço encontrado
Versão gratuita
Versão de teste gratuita
140
1
4,8 (468)
4,7 (468)
4,9 (468)
VS.
Preço inicial
Opções de preços
Recursos
Integrações
Praticidade
Relação qualidade/preço
Atendimento ao cliente
Nenhum preço encontrado
Versão gratuita
Versão de teste gratuita
57
5
4,0 (80)
4,1 (80)
4,2 (80)
As barras de classificação verdes mostram o produto vencedor com base na nota média e no número de avaliações.

Outras ótimas alternativas ao Limble CMMS

FMS:Workplace
Melhores recursos
Gestão da manutenção
Gestão do espaço
Reservas de quartos
MAPCON
Melhores recursos
Acesso para Celular
Agendamento de manutenção
Gestão de pedidos de trabalho
ManWinWin
Melhores recursos
Agendamento de manutenção
Gestão de pedidos de trabalho
Gestão preventiva
AppSheet
Melhores recursos
Controles/permissões de acesso
Desenvolvimento de aplicativos web/mobile
Plataforma no-code
L2L Connected Workforce Platform
Melhores recursos
Criação de ordem de serviço
Gestão de pedidos de trabalho
Gestão preventiva
Eptura Asset
Melhores recursos
Agendamento de manutenção
Criação de ordem de serviço
Gestão preventiva
RhinoFit
Melhores recursos
Acesso para Celular
Cobrança e faturamento
Gestão de associação
eWorkOrders CMMS
Melhores recursos
Acesso para Celular
Gestão de pedidos de trabalho
Gestão preventiva
Maintainly
Melhores recursos
Acesso para Celular
Gestão de pedidos de trabalho
Histórico de atendimento

Avaliações do Limble CMMS

Pontuação média

Geral
4,8
Praticidade
4,8
Atendimento ao cliente
4,9
Recursos
4,7
Relação qualidade/preço
4,7

Avaliações por tamanho de empresa (funcionários)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Encontre avaliações segundo pontuações

5
84%
4
16%
3
0%
2
0%
Avaliador Verificado
Usuário do LinkedIn Verificado
Aparelhos médicos, 1.001–5.000 funcionários
Usou o software para: Avaliação gratuita
Fonte da avaliação

monitoramento de controle de produção

5,0 há 2 anos

Comentários: ele consegue calcular tempo de produção e isso influencia na controle de recursos humanos

Vantagens:

É um produto fácil de usar, de acessar e de navegar. Possui uma interface positiva com as opções do processo bem explicitas.

Desvantagens:

Achei o valor para adquirir alto. Um software como este pode ser utilizado em vários setores, com muito proveito, porém o custo é alto e nem todas as empresas tem a visão de investimento.

Larry
Larry
Senior Maintenance Technician, EUA
Usuário do LinkedIn Verificado
Engenharia mecânica ou industrial, 51–200 funcionários
Usou o software para: 1 a 5 meses
Fonte da avaliação

Alternativas consideradas anteriormente:

Reliability starts with a good CMMS.

5,0 há 2 semanas Novo

Vantagens:

Limble has been instrumental in implementing a maintenance reliability program here at RIE. As a power user and for the operators submitting work requests, the Limble system is user-friendly. I like that anyone can submit a work request without needing to log into Limble, and I like that the requestors get updates on the work requests they submit. Customer service for Limble is remarkable, and my CSM [sensitive content hidden] always answers my questions in a very timely fashion. [sensitive content hidden]did an excellent job teaching me the ropes of Limble, and I am very pleased to have those training recordings and all the great training on Limble's YouTube channel.

Desvantagens:

I have not found anything I dislike about Limble. It is extremely customizable, so if there is something you don't like or you want to add something, you are more than likely able to change/add those things in Limble.

Andrew
parts and purchasing specialist, EUA
Mineração e metais, 51–200 funcionários
Usou o software para: 1 a 5 meses
Fonte da avaliação

Our experience after a few months

4,0 há 2 meses Novo

Comentários: I really like our initial meetings with [sensitive content hidden], she was very knowledgeable in answering our questions. Working With [sensitive content hidden] was great, we had a lot work to do as for transferring our data and she helped us along the way. Everyone has been helpful in the live chat as well. I do wish the training sessions were longer than the half hour that was allotted. AS we spent a lot of time asking questions from the previous week and it didn't always give much time to learn and understand what we needed to learn. Overall Limble has a very good and affordable product, but it definitely has some growing and changing that needs to be done. I am optimistic that they are listening to the changes that we are recommending based on our experiences so far. I think they have a very bright future in the industry.

Vantagens:

It took us from using a very outdated unconnected software system to a much more modern and user friendly option

Desvantagens:

Sorting parts the way you want can be difficult if you do not understand what you are trying to search, sometimes changes say that they have saved but when you go back later they were not. Also searching previous pm does not bring up the results we are looking for. I think the biggest drawbacks are the fact that you cannot save a screen setup you want and go back to it instead once you leave that tab you have to start over so you have to keep several internet browser pages open if you want to work on more than one thing at a time. Lastly when viewing a list of parts assigned under an asset there is no search to get to something quickly so you may have to scroll through hundreds of parts.

Mike
Director of Facilities, EUA
Indústria farmacêutica, 201–500 funcionários
Usou o software para: 6 a 12 meses
Fonte da avaliação
Fonte: SoftwareAdvice

Not designed for a Manufacturing Company

2,0 há 11 meses

Comentários: I initially evaluated 4 different systems and was excited that Limble had good reviews and looked like a nice application. A few months in i discovered it was not designed for manufacturing. The Asset was not the driver of all information. The expect me to have a separate PM for every asset and i have hundreds of similar assets. Limble keeps changing features and then asking foe more money if i want those features back.

Vantagens:

Point and click, windows based interface was important because my team had never used a CMMS and it would need to be easy to navigate

Desvantagens:

The back end was not designed as an asset based CMMS. it was clumsy to implement, the reports are not catered to manufacturing. The asset does NOT drive all the information. PM's are difficult to implement and track. There is no way to know how many PM's are coming in the future.

Da
Maintenance Management, Espanha
Empacotamento e contêineres, 501–1.000 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de dois anos
Fonte da avaliação

Alternativas consideradas anteriormente:

Limble, the best CMMS in 25 years of experience

5,0 há 2 meses Novo

Comentários: It is very rewarding as a manager to know that if you need information in less than a minute you will have that information and it helps you to make very quick and accurate decisions. It is also gratifying that 60 people use the tool on a daily basis and have no complaints about its handling, functionality, ease of use, Etc. 100% RECOMMENDABLE

Vantagens:

Ease of implementation, you don't need anyone to implement it, ease of use for both technicians and managers, all the information displayed when you click on it takes you to the source of that information. Very powerful mobile tool makes life easier for technicians who use it on a daily basis.

Desvantagens:

Some small improvements could be made but his team is always in continuous development.