--- description: Tudo sobre Juro: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Juro - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Brasil 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Sistemas de Gestão de Contratos](/directory/30078/contract-management/software) > [Juro](/software/167130/juro) # Juro Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.br/software/167130/juro Página: 1 / 3\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/167130/juro?page=2) > Gerenciamento de contratos com inteligência artificial, desenvolvido para empresas modernas. > > Conclusão: 41 usuários atribuíram a nota **4.8/5**. Melhor classificado para **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa o Juro? Equipes de vendas, RH, operações e jurídicas. Entre os clientes há empresas em crescimento e grandes corporações. ## Estatísticas e notas | Métrica | Classificação | Detalhes | | **Geral** | **4.8/5** | 41 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.8/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.9/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.5/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Recursos | 4.5/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Porcentagem de recomendação | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: Juro - **Localização**: London, Reino Unido - **Fundada**: 2016 ## Contexto comercial - **Público-alvo**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Implantação e plataformas**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Android (celular), iPhone (celular), iPad (tablet) - **Idiomas**: alemão, dinamarquês, espanhol, finlandês, francês, holandês, húngaro, inglês, irlandês, italiano, norueguês, polonês, português, russo, sueco, tcheco, ucraniano - **Países disponíveis**: Albânia, Alemanha, Andorra, Anguila, Antígua e Barbuda, Aruba, Austrália, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermudas, Bielorrússia, Bulgária, Bélgica, Bósnia e Herzegovina, Canadá, Chipre, Cidade do Vaticano, Costa Rica, Croácia e mais 95 ## Recursos - Armazenamento de documentos - Assinatura eletrônica - Captura de documentos - Colaboração em equipe - Compartilhamento de arquivos - Controle de versões - Controle do processo de aprovação - Controles/permissões de acesso - Ferramentas de colaboração - Gestão do fluxo de trabalho - Modelos personalizáveis - Modelos pré-elaborados - Pesquisa de texto completo - Pesquisa e filtro - Rastreamento de conformidade - Third-Party Integrations ## Integrações (11 no total) - Google Drive - Greenhouse - HubSpot CRM - Okta - Salesforce Platform - Salesforce Sales Cloud - Slack - Workday Financial Management - Workday HCM - Workday Talent Management - Zapier ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Assistência 24/7 - Bate-papo ## Category - [Sistemas de Gestão de Contratos](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30078/contract-management/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Sistemas de Gestão de Contratos](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30078/contract-management/software) - [Software de Gestão de Documentos](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30063/document-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Docusign](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/121506/DocuSign) — 4.7/5 (9308 reviews) 2. [Deel](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/205015/deel) — 4.9/5 (4271 reviews) 3. [Adobe Acrobat](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/1012240/adobe-acrobat-dc) — 4.7/5 (4187 reviews) 4. [Webdox](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/197944/webdox) — 4.7/5 (147 reviews) 5. [ContractSafe](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/153712/contractsafe) — 4.8/5 (179 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Great cutting-edge contract management software" — 5.0/5 > **Sharief** | *24 de outubro de 2018* | Imobiliárias | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Juro makes creating and managing customer contracts at scale an absolute breeze. We can get a customised contract out to a customer in seconds rather than 30+ minutes now, are able to chat with customers and answer their questions within the contract itself, and get instantly informed via Slack when it's been signed. > > **Desvantagens**: There are two primary areas of improvement: - The first is the ability to track changes - we create new versions of contracts on a constant basis, so being able to redline, see what changes have been made, and store those versions in a logical way would be hugely helpful - The second related point is the version control - the filing system for contract templates is rudimentary (i.e. there is one folder for all templates) and would be improved if it was possible to add subfolders However, the benefits for us far outweigh the above as we have workarounds > > Juro makes the life for our legal and sales teams significantly easier. We've cut down the time taken to create a contract by 96% and also made tracking of signatures much more visible. ----- ### "Great contract tool" — 4.0/5 > **Avaliador Verificado** | *8 de agosto de 2025* | Hospitais e Saúde | Taxa de recomendação: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Juro makes contract creation and management feel intuitive and collaborative. In particular the contract based editor is great - it’s much easier to use than clunky Word-based workflows. I liked how easy it was to standardise contracts, collect approvals, and keep everything in one place without having to constantly jump between tools. It really helped reduce legal bottlenecks and gave our ops team better visibility and control. > > **Desvantagens**: Personally, the pricing was a challenge for us, especially as a growing company with evolving priorities. While the features are solid, it became difficult to justify the cost when we were reassessing our tech stack. Some of the reporting felt a bit limited too - we would’ve liked more flexible analytics around contract statuses etc. > > Overall, Juro was a great solution for simplifying and speeding up our contract workflows. It’s well-designed, user-friendly, and clearly built with operations and legal teams in mind. We still use it for some planning templates, which speaks to how useful the platform is – but ultimately, we had to step away from it due to budget constraints. If pricing aligns with your stage and needs, it’s a very strong option. ----- ### "Great contract tool" — 4.0/5 > **Zach** | *3 de abril de 2026* | Serviços financeiros | Taxa de recomendação: 7.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Juro streamlines contract creation and approvals, giving users clear visibility over contract status, terms, and sign‑off. Standardised templates and structured workflows reduce errors, speed up execution, and improve control over commercial agreements without heavy legal involvement. > > **Desvantagens**: Nothing comes to mind so far; the platform has met our needs without causing issues or friction. etc ----- ### "Something good but major flaw" — 3.0/5 > **Terho** | *12 de abril de 2024* | Software | Taxa de recomendação: 2.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Pretty easy to use and contract negotiation part functions well. > > **Desvantagens**: It has major flaws concerning signing procedure. Attachments are not legally part of the contract since they are not merged as attachments to actual signed contract. And you can change attachments after signing. This has caused major issues with the customers. ----- ### "Allows me to avoid converting contract drafts into a jumbled email chain" — 5.0/5 > **Brion** | *26 de janeiro de 2026* | Software | Taxa de recomendação: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Mainly, I use Juro for drafting and reviewing contract versions, sending those versions as well as having them signed in a single application rather than constantly jumping back and forth between MS Word documents and emails. On an everyday basis I am working on Juro making small tweaks to contract language, requesting comments from team members via tags and sending the final versions of contracts for signature in a single application. What I like about Juro is I can clearly see which part of the process has stalled rather than having to guess who still needs to look at it. > > **Desvantagens**: Editing more complex contracts can sometimes be somewhat restrictive, particularly if I need to do some extremely detailed formatting of that contract. Also, I had to spend more time than I anticipated cleaning up, editing and moving all of our current templates into the new system. Although some of the functionality in Juro was incredibly powerful, it was not always immediately apparent until I had spent enough time using the product. > > Juro significantly reduces the amount of "back and forth" and version confusion that occurred previously with contracts being created and managed through emails and shared drive systems. That results in reduced delays, as well as significantly less mental overhead (or stress) when managing many different contracts simultaneously. ----- Página: 1 / 3\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/167130/juro?page=2) ## Links - [Ver em Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/167130/juro) ## Esta página está disponível nos seguintes idiomas | Localidade | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Dados estruturados