--- description: Tudo sobre AssociationVoting: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: AssociationVoting - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Brasil 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Sistemas de Votação](/directory/31217/voting/software) > [AssociationVoting](/software/172696/associationvoting) # AssociationVoting Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.br/software/172696/associationvoting Página: 1 / 8\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/172696/associationvoting?page=2) > Solução de votação via internet para associações gerenciarem indicações, eleições online, coleta de procurações e cédulas em papel. > > Conclusão: 179 usuários atribuíram a nota **4.7/5**. Melhor classificado para **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa o AssociationVoting? Associações profissionais, associações comerciais, associações de proprietários (HOA e POA nas siglas em inglês), entre outras. ## Estatísticas e notas | Métrica | Classificação | Detalhes | | **Geral** | **4.7/5** | 179 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 4.7/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.8/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.7/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Recursos | 4.7/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Porcentagem de recomendação | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: AssociationVoting - **Localização**: Howell, EUA - **Fundada**: 2004 ## Contexto comercial - **Preço inicial**: US$ 99,00 - **Modelo de preços**: (Versão gratuita disponível) (Teste grátis) - **Público-alvo**: Profissional autônomo, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Implantação e plataformas**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web, Android (celular), iPhone (celular), iPad (tablet) - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Países disponíveis**: Canadá, Estados Unidos ## Recursos - Acompanhamento de participação - Autenticação de eleitores - Controle de eleições - Cédulas de votação impressas - Enquetes online - Enquetes/votações - Ferramentas de análises de dados - Gerenciamento de comentários - Gestão de cédulas - Gestão de eleitores - Gestão de pesquisas/enquetes - Imagem de marca personalizável - Indicações - Live Results Sharing - Múltiplos tipos de perguntas - Perfis de candidatos - Relatórios e estatística - Votação online - Votação ponderada ## Opções de suporte - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Fórum - Base de conhecimento - Suporte por telefone - Bate-papo ## Category - [Sistemas de Votação](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/31217/voting/software) ## Categorias relacionadas - [Sistemas de Votação](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/31217/voting/software) - [Software para Votação](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/31220/polling/software) ## Alternativas 1. [NemoVote](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/203575/nemovote) — 4.8/5 (72 reviews) 2. [SurveyLegend](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/156752/surveylegend) — 4.6/5 (966 reviews) 3. [eBallot](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/172194/eballot) — 4.1/5 (19 reviews) 4. [Echo360](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/172761/turningpoint) — 4.2/5 (44 reviews) 5. [DialogLoop](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/180938/dialogloop) — 4.6/5 (8 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "Great customer service and easy to implement" — 5.0/5 > **Dave** | *27 de outubro de 2025* | Gestão da educação | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Great customer service and fast responses if I needed assistance. Great UI for members to use for their voting needs. I also really like the voting report to use to track member engagement year over year. Great built-in features to replicate past elections to keep the settings the same. > > **Desvantagens**: Not many cons. There is a little learning curve but AssociationVoting staff are so responsive it's very easy to troubleshoot. > > Very positive. Over the years, different leaders at my organization have asked about exploring different voting options, and as the staff member who administers and executes the elections, I am always a proponent of continuing to use AssociationVoting\! ----- ### "Best Value and Quality Voting Softeware" — 5.0/5 > **Jim** | *20 de janeiro de 2026* | Organização cívica e social | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: For the most part, the learning curve on the AssociationVoting software was relatively short. Customer Support was quick and accurate whenever we needed guidance. After evaluating 21 different eVoting software packages, AssociationVoting proved to be the best value for our money. The system allows for customization of the login procedure through a user-friendly table, which is one of the biggest advantages we found compared to the competition. This feature enabled us to guarantee one vote per household (per our bylaws), even though multiple email accounts exist within each household. > > **Desvantagens**: The terminology used for “campaigns” took a little time to understand at first, and I had to contact Customer Support to fully grasp how this feature worked. In this system, a campaign simply refers to scheduled voter reminder emails that are automatically sent at specific points during the voting window (for example, at the beginning, middle, and end of the voting period). If this feature were titled “Scheduled Voter Reminder Emails,” I believe it would have been more self-explanatory and easier to understand. > > Overall the AssociationVoting system was easy to set up and it has user-friendly interfaces that keeps track of the voting. ----- ### "Simple and Reliable Voting Platform" — 5.0/5 > **Avaliador Verificado** | *30 de junho de 2026* | Serviços e tecnologia da informação | Taxa de recomendação: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: What I liked most was how easy it made the voting process. Setting up elections and collecting votes was straightforward, and members could participate without needing much guidance. The platform also helped keep everything organized and transparent. > > **Desvantagens**: The interface could feel a bit dated in some areas, and a few settings took some time to figure out. Adding more customization options and a more modern design would make the experience even better. > > Overall, I had a positive experience using AssociationVoting. It simplified election management, made voting convenient for members, and helped ensure the process was fair and organized. While there are a few areas that could be improved, it has been a reliable solution for our needs. ----- ### "Notes on AssociationVoting from a Staff User" — 3.0/5 > **Jingyao** | *28 de julho de 2026* | Gestão de organizações sem fins lucrativos | Taxa de recomendação: 6.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: For context, AssociationVoting is the only election management tool I've used, so I don't have much experience or insight with other platforms to have a strong opinion. I will say, as a staff member who inherited this platform from a past administrator with no instructions, it is a self-teachable tool. This year, we ended up in a strange situation where two elections were needed. The customer service line was great. The representative was super helpful and explained things clearly, walking me through what was needed to hold two elections. The process wasn't ideal, but the representative provided friendly and quality service. > > **Desvantagens**: I mentioned that the platform is self-teachable, but it's not intuitive. The guides are very wordy, and I think more visual prompts would be helpful. For example, there are so many prompts for personalized language, but it's not always clear where a user will see the prompt and how it would appear on their screen. It requires extra time to create test voter profiles just to see how things appear on the voter's end. > > Again, I don't have experience with other platforms, other than as a voter for another membership association I'm a member of. I think my experience as a staff member who helps manage the election has been a bit mixed. I don't think it's a difficult platform, but I can see how it might be challenging for others to manage, which is something I think about as we work toward transitioning election management to a volunteer member committee. I'm not opposed to keeping AssociationVoting as our platform for another year or so. ----- ### "Glowing Review" — 5.0/5 > **Carrie** | *29 de maio de 2026* | Organização cívica e social | Taxa de recomendação: 10.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Once support staff explained how the software works, it was easy and an enjoyable experience. User friendly\! > > **Desvantagens**: Sometimes you have to be honest. I have wracked my brain trying to find a con or something I didn't like. Sorry to disappoint, but there was nothing. > > From the very beginning to the end of our election, it was smooth sailing all the way. Support, timeliness and going that extra mile for us made an enormous difference. Our group was very satisfied\! Thank you\! ----- Página: 1 / 8\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/172696/associationvoting?page=2) ## Links - [Ver em Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/172696/associationvoting) ## Esta página está disponível nos seguintes idiomas | Localidade | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Dados estruturados