--- description: Tudo sobre Glass Factory: preço, alternativas, vantagens e desvantagens, funcionalidades e avaliações de outros usuários. Saiba mais! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Glass Factory - Preço, avaliações e classificação - Capterra Brasil 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Software de Gestão de Recursos](/directory/30859/resource-management/software) > [Glass Factory](/software/189275/glass-factory) # Glass Factory Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.br/software/189275/glass-factory Página: 1 / 2\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/189275/glass-factory?page=2) > Plataforma de planejamento de recursos visuais e controle do tempo. > > Conclusão: 8 usuários atribuíram a nota **4.0/5**. Melhor classificado para **Probabilidade de recomendação**. ----- ## Resumo ### Quem usa o Glass Factory? Atende agências de todos os tamanhos que têm operações complexas e precisam de visibilidade e controle total das operações em escala. ## Estatísticas e notas | Métrica | Classificação | Detalhes | | **Geral** | **4.0/5** | 8 Avaliações | | Praticidade | 3.6/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Suporte ao cliente | 4.0/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Relação qualidade/preço | 4.3/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Recursos | 3.4/5 | Com base em avaliações gerais | | Porcentagem de recomendação | 70% | (7/10 Probabilidade de recomendação) | ## Sobre o fornecedor - **Empresa**: Glass Factory - **Fundada**: 2016 ## Contexto comercial - **Preço inicial**: US$ 5,00 - **Modelo de preços**: (Teste grátis) - **Público-alvo**: 2–10 - **Implantação e plataformas**: Nuvem, SaaS, baseado na web - **Idiomas**: inglês - **Países disponíveis**: Estados Unidos ## Recursos - Agendamento de recursos - Ferramentas de colaboração - Gestão de capacidades - Gestão de projetos - Previsão - Rastreamento de habilidades - Relatórios de utilização - Seguimento de relatórios/projetos ## Opções de suporte - Assistência 24/7 ## Category - [Software de Gestão de Recursos](https://www.capterra.com.br/directory/30859/resource-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Teamwork.com](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/120390/teamwork-projects) — 4.5/5 (934 reviews) 2. [Float](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/136078/float) — 4.5/5 (1615 reviews) 3. [Resource Guru](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/134429/resource-guru) — 4.7/5 (539 reviews) 4. [Napta](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/196686/pickyourskills) — 4.7/5 (127 reviews) 5. [Birdview](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/1014945/birdview-psa) — 4.5/5 (475 reviews) ## Avaliações ### "A great solution for resource planning & profitability analysis in a 55+ person development studio" — 4.0/5 > **Shaun** | *24 de julho de 2019* | Software | Taxa de recomendação: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Very intuitive and easy to begin using. The ui is modern, and it took us very little time to get up and running. > > **Desvantagens**: It's a bit confusing to know exactly what impacts the reporting metrics, but that is partly just us learning the software, vs. a shortcoming in the product. It would help if the support documentation was more detailed so can look up more things ourselves. > > Overall, we've been very happy with the service we received and with the product itself. It provides great visibility into our resourcing, which helps with planning and hiring as we grow our business. We use a different tool for time tracking and look forward to testing their API to be able to import this data. ----- ### "Awesome tool, with a great support team" — 5.0/5 > **Bethany** | *24 de julho de 2019* | Design | Taxa de recomendação: 7.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The look and feel of the tool were fun to use. I appreciated the ease of which we could see the project detail laid out. As well as how simple it was to add or remove users to project streams. The clear visibility of time booked to work, as well as showing when teams are overworked was also pivotal. I also really appreciated the reporting sections, as these took the data I currently run manually and calculated a running tally -- DAILY\! > > **Desvantagens**: Ultimately, we ended up not going with GlassFactory, largely due to the fact that the way we track our project work didn't directly line up with how GlassFactory was setup. We wanted to have more ability to run multi-nationally and had a large list of features that were not on the list. > > Our studio greatly appreciated the care the GlassFactory team took to allow our team to design, create and ultimately implement new processes and procedures. Through every step of the process, their team assisted and answered all of our questions, with a smile\! ----- ### "A Tool Build for Agency that never made it out of MVP" — 3.0/5 > **Daniel** | *24 de julho de 2019* | Design | Taxa de recomendação: 6.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: The vision for this product was great. We loved that you could integrate time tracking and scheduling in a way that directly aligned with the way agencies work. We use Quickbooks to invoice, and there was a pretty good integration though we didnt actually use the GF templates. > > **Desvantagens**: So many bugs early on. This really soured us on our migration from Harvest as we were never able to resolve data discrepencies even after engaging the GF team. This meant that our historical veiw was incomplete Also, we expected a way to account for sub-contracting on a non-fixed basis (basically, using contractors but not a single freelancer). There was no way to properly account for this which was a key feature we expected. Lastly, time entry was cumbersome. The desktop app never worked, there was no mobile app, and the UI for time entry overall was sluggish. > > I wanted to like this product. The original team behind it seemed to have such great vision, but after about a year of using it, it became clear that this was tailored to specific set of users (probably a big agency) and not us. We eventually switched back to Harvest based on it's familiarity, better user interfaces, better desktop/mobile apps and the fact that we could better enter subcontractor invoices as expenses against budgets (which wasnt perfect but at least related these costs against our total budget). ----- ### "Simple and straightforward application. Does what it needs to do with some room for improvement." — 4.0/5 > **Simon** | *23 de julho de 2019* | Desenvolvimento de programas | Taxa de recomendação: 8.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: does what i need it to do. a simple time tracking platform for the every day employee. > > **Desvantagens**: - sometimes seems to be slow to sync up with changes made - the way to find the exact time bucket isn't as intuitive as it can be (hidden behind drop downs) ----- ### "Great Resource Management and Expense Forecasting" — 5.0/5 > **Thorren** | *26 de julho de 2019* | Publicidade e marketing | Taxa de recomendação: 9.0/10 > > **Vantagens**: Organization of data is logical and clear. The tool does a great job of allowing for setup and management of the right pieces of information. Reporting options and export options are good. > > **Desvantagens**: API has some limitations that aren't yet addressed, looking to be able to do more input/transfer of data directly from other systems. ----- Página: 1 / 2\ Próximo: [Próxima página](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/189275/glass-factory?page=2) ## Links - [Ver em Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.br/software/189275/glass-factory) ## Esta página está disponível nos seguintes idiomas | Localidade | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Dados estruturados