15 anos ajudando empresas brasileiras
a escolherem o melhor software

Conheça eFront

eFront Insight LP: a plataforma eFront Insight integra dados diretamente do eFront Data Intelligence, o melhor serviço de dados da eFronts. Originados diretamente dos GPs e submetidos a protocolos de validação rigorosos, os dados EDI se tornaram o padrão para granularidade e integridade de dados. Dados em nível de fundos e benchmarks precisos também são integrados diretamente do PitchBook para aumentar a agilidade e a eficiência das análises do mercado privado.

Quem usa eFront?

Mais de 700 empresas escolheram a eFront como provedor alternativo de soluções de investimento e gestão de riscos.

Está em dúvida sobre o eFront? Compare com uma alternativa popular

eFront

eFront

2,7 (3)
US$ 1,00
ano
Versão gratuita
Versão de teste gratuita
21
1
2,3 (3)
1,3 (3)
3,7 (3)
VS.
Preço inicial
Opções de preços
Recursos
Integrações
Praticidade
Relação qualidade/preço
Atendimento ao cliente
Nenhum preço encontrado
Versão gratuita
Versão de teste gratuita
349
13
3,8 (1.529)
3,8 (1.529)
3,7 (1.529)
As barras de classificação verdes mostram o produto vencedor com base na nota média e no número de avaliações.

Outras ótimas alternativas ao eFront

VestServe
Melhores recursos
Nenhum recurso foi avaliado pelos usuários para este produto.
NetSuite
Melhores recursos
Alerta de pagamentos duplicados
Plano de contas
Preenchimento de cheques
Backstop
Melhores recursos
Gerenciamento de contatos
Gerenciamento de documentos
Rastreamento de relacionamentos
Octopus
Melhores recursos
Gerenciamento de contatos
Para fundos de investimento
Registro de auditoria
Unity
Melhores recursos
Gestão do fluxo de trabalho
Relatórios e análise de dados
Relatórios personalizáveis
Dynamo
Melhores recursos
Gerenciamento de contatos
Gestão de leads
Relatórios e análise de dados
Obsidian Suite
Melhores recursos
Nenhum recurso foi avaliado pelos usuários para este produto.
Ledgy
Melhores recursos
Gestão de Cap Tables
Gestão de aquisição
Gestão de valuation
Corporater Business Management Platform
Melhores recursos
Definição/Acompanhamento de metas
Modelos personalizáveis
Monitoramento do KPI

Avaliações do eFront

Pontuação média

Geral
2,7
Praticidade
2,3
Atendimento ao cliente
3,7
Recursos
3,0
Relação qualidade/preço
1,3

Avaliações por tamanho de empresa (funcionários)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Encontre avaliações segundo pontuações

4
33%
2
67%
Christoph
Investment Associate, Irlanda
Capital de risco e capital privado, 11–50 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de dois anos
Fonte da avaliação

Outdated Fund Software

4,0 há 3 anos

Comentários: It very complicated and the software does only make sense if a person is fully dedicated to this software as it requires several courses. There are better solutions out already with easier implementations.

Vantagens:

In principle everything you want to have implemented is possible.

Desvantagens:

The implementation is almost not doable by yourself. Therefore, eFront has to deploy your wishes, with is associated with high costs. The software is not self-explanary.

Tia
Fund Accounting Manager, EUA
Capital de risco e capital privado, 51–200 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de dois anos
Fonte da avaliação
Fonte: SoftwareAdvice

Don't recommend for VC/PE.

2,0 há 2 anos

Comentários: So so.

Vantagens:

Viewer friendly. Easy to do inputs and export excels.

Desvantagens:

Complex entries may not be correct, may not exist. Costs additional money to implement basic stuffs. Data stuck in the system. Carrying time marks in varies calc that affect results (the time you inputting JEs). We tried their FrontPM for valuation data collection and it was a huge failure.

Avaliador Verificado
Usuário do LinkedIn Verificado
Capital de risco e capital privado, 2–10 funcionários
Usou o software para: Mais de um ano
Fonte da avaliação

Disappointed: Flexible but requires a Ton of Configuration and Lacks Basic Functionality out-the-box

2,0 há 4 anos

Comentários: The overall experience with eFront has been disappointing. We expected a mature, fit for purpose solution that could address 90% of our requirements out-the-box. Instead, it required an inordinate amount of time and effort to get the system to where it now works. It is disappointing that we do not automatically get new functionality. Furthermore, even basic changes to our business will require us to pay eFront for professional services to make configuration changes e.g. if we decide on a different carry/waterfall structure for a new fund; or if we setup a new fund with a master-feeder structure.

Vantagens:

1. Integrated suite of tools. Provides a suite of tools to manage a private equity or venture capital portfolio - managing the deal flow process, doing portfolio management, managing fund investors, doing fund accounting, filing deal docs. It is useful having all the information relating to a deal integrated and centralised in one place. 2. Flexibility to configure screens and data fields Within the constraints of the underlying data structure, there is significant flexibility to configure custom layouts for screens (both to view and enter data). You can also define almost any custom data fields that you wish to track for a portfolio company, fund, or contact. 3. Workflow tool Provides a tool to "automate" the deal flow process - processing a deal through the different stages from when a decision is made to invest until the transaction is completed and the deal has been booked. The deal stages can be customised, required data fields can be enforced, relatively complex deal logic can be modelled. 4. Integrated Accounting The system provide a native integrated accounting system with general ledger entries automatically made when asset (buy, sell, revalue, write off) and fund transactions (fund expenses, capital draws, distributions) are booked.

Desvantagens:

1. Requires extensive configuration Despite being focussed on the alternative asset sector and having a dedicated offering for private equity/venture capital, the solution requires a TON of configuration. 2. "But you didn't specify that" The fact that a specific type of transaction is available in the out-the-box system does not mean it works. If you did not explicitly state that you want that transaction to work, it might well not be configured. If not discovered during configuration, you have to pay extra to get it rectified. 3. Lacking some of the most basic functionality out the box None of the following was possible without custom configuration (for which the customer has to pay): booking dividends, booking stock splits, booking brokerage or transaction costs on a stock disposal, revaluing foreign currency denominated assets in a batch transaction, booking a valuation for a warrant. 4. Surprisingly buggy During the process of configuring and using the software, we were surprised by the number of bugs we uncovered. Many of the bug fixes are not made available to you - they are only incorporated in new releases. 5. Upgrades not (really) included This is not a modern SaaS application despite being priced like one with a substantial annual license fee. You do not automatically get upgraded or access to new features. You need to go through an extensive upgrade process, which will almost certainly require professional services at an additional cost.